【傑作第三十二部　28選】ピエール＝オーギュスト・ルノワールー印象派の中心人物ー人物画の名手ー色彩の魔術師ー後期の古典主義的傾向

【傑作第三十二部　28選】ピエール＝オーギュスト・ルノワールー印象派の中心人物ー人物画の名手ー色彩の魔術師ー後期の古典主義的傾向

Part 32, No. 28, Renoir: A Central Figure in Impressionism: The Intersection of Gaze and Music. Renoir: Girls at the Piano, the Best. Pierre Austere’s Girls at the Piano, painted around 1892 on canvas in the Musée de l’Orangerie collection , is one of several highly evocative paintings that explore the intellectual interior space and musical imagery of late 19th-century France. This work is one of several produced in response to official commissions from the French government in the early 1890s, and is considered a relatively early work. Official Commission and the Work of a Direct Subject. Around 1892, Renoir received his first official artistic commission from the state. The painting he created for this occasion depicts young girls at the piano, a typical scene of bourgeois everyday life. However, this subject does not belong to traditional academic paintings that portray national restoration or heroism. Rather, it presents a new form of public life pioneered by Impressionist painting. Here, Renoir returns to the everyday lives of young girls that he himself had previously depicted. But this is not simply eerie. Rather, in this work, the motifs of intimate space and the girls ‘ postures are recast into something more structurally focused. Particularly noteworthy is how themes such as femininity, education, and family were visualized and reconstructed as artistic expression in late 19th-century French society. The white space and structural strength are characteristic of a revision . This work, “Girls Playing the Piano,” was later completed. It is believed to have been a revision made in 1897 prior to its acquisition by the museum. The depiction of the background and space is sketchy, with furniture and wall decorations largely omitted. However, this omission highlights the presence of the girls and enhances the concentration of the image . The composition is nearly symmetrical, with the girl on the left leaning slightly forward and the girl on the right leaning in close, as if supporting her. Their relationship is not dominant, but rather possesses a structural balance that complements each other. This creates a sense of sexual stability within the picture, giving the entire painting a shared breath. Here, Renoir attempts to connect writing and listening . The music has not yet begun, but the two girls’ gazes and postures, as well as the silence as they approach the piano, suggest the sound is about to emerge. Though it is a painting, the work here invites an aural sense. Color and Tactile Expression: Renoir is known as an Impressionist painter, but after the 1880s his style underwent a major shift , moving toward a more architectural and tactile approach. This shift is clearly evident in this work. The textures of cotton and silk are expertly expressed on the surfaces of the clothing , and a soft light permeates the girls’ hair and skin. The colors never assert themselves, but they subtly envelop the entire painting. Of particular note is the piano’s black, austere motif and the soft, aerobic forms of the girls. The coexistence of these different textures enhances the aural reality of the pictorial space. The hands are not yet on the keys, yet the future movement of the hands reaching out is incorporated into the painting. In other words, this work is a painting that has time. Even more remarkable is the subdued tones of the colors, which strongly convey an interiority. The use of subtle shadows, blending with the softness of the piano, the flush of the girl’s cheeks, and the white of her clothing, conveys to the viewer a presence that transcends the subject’s texture. Such color choices, imbued with a musical rhythm and a subtly harmonious quality, reflect Renoir’s color philosophy. The aesthetics of intimacy and the public sphere, the children listening to music, and the sisters teaching each other, are examples of idealized feminine figures in the 19th-century Bourgian household. In this respect, this work reflects the moral values and pedagogy of the middle and third classes of the time. However, Renoir did not conform to such moral ideals; rather, he pursued harmony and continuity as an artistic pursuit. The girls’ figures are purely natural, with no trace of staging. If painting is an art form, then the gaze depicted here is that of a mother watching over her, and the painting itself blends naturally into the space, as if it were a member of the family . With this celebration of intimacy, Renoir could be said to be redefining the public nature of modern painting. Furthermore, when viewed from the perspective of how the domestic space was idealized and portrayed in the culture of the late 19th century, this work truly embodies a critical reflection on the institutionalization of the gaze. This work is not simply about intimacy or comfort; it is indirectly connected through these two volumes to complex issues such as the position of women and children in modern society and the role of art. From this, or rather the beginning of a two-volume work, Renoir would later paint a more accomplished version of Girls Playing the Piano, settling on the same theme. However, this work, Girls at the Piano, possesses a liberation not found in the finished work. The margins, omissions, and impromptu moments stimulate the viewer’s imagination, freely bridging the gap between seeing and listening. This work demonstrates the potential of painting as a place for questions to arise, rather than a place for complete answers. Above all, this work possesses the gentle power to gently reconcile oppositions between painting and music, seeing and listening, the individual and society, completion and refinement . It is a quiet conviction at the beginning of modernism. What Renoir entrusted to this unique space is nothing less than an internal question that modern art must confront. That is why The Girls at the Piano speaks to the completion of what we see today, leaving a profound aftereffect, like music resonating in silence . In the midst of this unique sound, two girls sit side by side around Renoir’s work, Yvonne and Christine Lerolle at the Piano. Their golden hair, falling to their chests, ripples around their soft, white shoulders. The piano lies quietly before their eyes. It is more than an instrument; it is a landscape, hidden within the present moment. Around 1897, Pierre-Auguste Renoir painted this unique interior scene. The work is titled Yvonne and Christine Lerolle at the Piano. The setting is likely a cultural salon in an artistic city. The models were the daughters of Henri Lerolle and his wife, Madre N. Square. The piano, the girls, and the paintings on the background wall are written in a tranquil, harmonious coexistence. Although Renoir painted with sound, we cannot hear the melody of silent music resonating on this canvas. Yet, the more we gaze at the painting, the more the entire canvas seems to begin to sing quietly. The girls are not actually playing the piano. It is unclear whether they are about to play or have just finished a piece. Their hands are unable to reach the keys, and they seem to gaze fixedly at something lurking deep within the soft black. The piano lid is open, and a piece of music is laid out on the stand. We don’t know what score it is, but there is music there, and the girls’ expressions and bodies resonate with it . Here, Renoir has brought the invisible art of music into the realm of painting . He has captured musical time not through sound, but through a balance of light and color, composition and texture . The home as a nest of culture. The Lerolles household where the two models, Yvonne and Christine Lerolles, grew up was a veritable melting pot of art. Shichiri Lerolle was a painter, and the walls of their home were said to be adorned with works by his admirers, Degas and Renoir . Poets, musicians, and painters gathered here, and the house was filled with the late Salon culture. Renoir deeply identified with the atmosphere of this home, for he himself sought to transcend mere technique and realism in his paintings and to infuse them into everyday life. The girls are not mere models; they are a crystallization of the soft presences that inhabit this cultural space . By sitting at the piano, they converse with the rich world around them. The sight of the two girls, sitting quietly at their instruments, seemingly encapsulates the atmosphere of the house . A room bathed in light. What is particularly striking about this work is the harmony of the soft light and space that shines into the room. Renoir painted light throughout his life. However, it is not the harsh sunlight seen in the Impressionist period. This painting is permeated with a warm, time-enveloping indoor light. The soft black of the piano reflects the light outside the window , and the white clothes of the girls have a ki-like glow. The gentle shadows cast on the two girls’ faces blend together rather than highlighting their features. Atmosphere, rather than form, is the focus. Several paintings are scribbled on the background wall . They are likely works by Renoir’s friend Degas, suggesting the mutual respect these two artists shared within a single cultural community. Many have pointed to the influence of 17th-century Dutch painting in this interior scene . It’s particularly tempting to compare it with Johannes Vermeer’s paintings, perhaps due to its theme of silence and concentration. Vermeer also produced many interior paintings with musical motifs. For example, in “Music Lesson” and “The Letter-Writing Woman and the Messenger,” instruments such as instruments, letters, and maps serve as vehicles for conveying the characters’ inner thoughts and the atmosphere of the moment. His paintings’ sense of stillness , the tension in silence, and the use of light certainly share a similarity with Renoir’s. Renoir’s works, however, are filled with vibrant colors and soft contours, in stark contrast to Vermeer’s . However, what the two artists share in common is their commitment to capturing the dignity of the moment. In the silent exchange between the girls, Renoir encapsulates a small universe of music, art, and home. It lies just outside of modernism. This work was featured in the exhibition “Two Masters: Renoir x Cézanne Modern” at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. Symbolizing the theme of this exhibition, Yvonne and Christine Lerolle at the Piano lies somewhere between traditional 19th-century interior painting and 20th-century modern painting. The softness of the colors, the figures’ shapes, and the depiction of the background strongly suggest classical elements, while the composition also embodies a bold experimental spirit. Rather than being precise, the figures’ faces, hands, and clothing are deliberately left vague, leaving room for the imagination . The girls’ postures, the way their hands are clasped, and the tilt of their heads—all of these aspects—are sculptural yet somehow dreamlike and unrealistic, connecting to the physicality and tactile expressions Renoir would pursue in his later years. The women exist in this space, yet simultaneously seem untethered from time. Above all, Yvonne and Christine Lerolle at the piano on a dreary morning is a painting of presence. The presence of sound, the presence of people, the presence of light, and the presence of culture. The figures of the girls around the piano represent the happy fusion of art and everyday life in the home setting of the late 19th century. The two girls in the painting are motionless. They simply stand there, sensing the music in their silence. And by gazing at this painting, we too can listen to the silent music that permeates it. Renoir’s paintings never overstate the point, but if we take the time to look at them, they slowly and surely speak to our hearts. As we listen to this wordless voice, the melody of the piano played by the two girls begins to softly resonate within us. The smile behind the mask , the sink and white leather surrounding Renoir’s clown-clad Claude de Renoir, creates a tranquil floral effect on the canvas. A small boy gazes intently at us, like the protagonist of a masquerade . Deep, loose curls, a white collar, and a slightly awkward gesture of the hands—this is a portrait of the young Claude de Renoir in costume for a fictional role. This work, “Claude Renoir as Pierrot,” was painted in 1909 by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, a leading Impressionist artist, using Suemsco-Claude as his model. Currently housed at the Musée de l’Orangerie in Paris, this work captivated many visitors when it was exhibited at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025 as part of the exhibition “Two Masters: Renoir and Sézanne .” This portrait is more than just a family portrait. The fiction of clown is a fiction placed on a child, and somehow it also evokes the shadow of the act itself. The father’s portrayal of his son transcends simple cuteness and affection, imbuing it with a profoundly evocative depth that seems to combine the traditions of Western painting with the father’s own late-life experiments. For Pierre Hauss and Renoir, their family was an inexhaustible source of inspiration. The smiles of their sons, the warmth of their mother, and the natural scenes of domestic life always provided soft form for the rhythm of his brushstrokes and the vibrant colors of his paintings. But it wasn’t simply a reproduction of happiness. At times, the tensions and patience that arose between him and the children who served as his models, as well as the differences between them, were also evident. This work, too, is a testament to the frictions of this artistic approach. Claude Renoir, the young boy dressed in a hieroglyphic costume, was only eight years old at the time. He later wrote that his father’s paintings were not all pleasant memories for him . Hours of posing, tedious conversations, and the portrait process for children meant being taken away from playtime. But the paintings born from that patience convey a palpable intimacy to us today. A relationship that can only be reconnected within the confines of the édée , a feeling that reaches beyond words. It is a vestige of the quiet time father and son spent together in the same space , a shared warmth that can only be felt in the name of art. In this portrait of Velázquez’s Gothic House , the presence of a column from an abandoned barracks in the background draws the viewer’s attention . This element is strongly influenced by portraits of royal children by Velázquez and his 1892 visit to Spain . Velázquez’s portraits of Philip’s princes and princesses, as well as the famous Infanta in Las Meninas, evoke both solemnity and childlikeness through the use of columns and curtains in a formal, sculptural interior . Following this tradition, Renoir also includes a column behind Claude, placing his work within the context of a historical portrait, even though it is a domestic scene. However, its weightiness is never overbearing. Rather, Renoir’s brushstrokes are endlessly soft and supple. The son, dressed in masquerade costume, evokes both royal solemnity and a touch of intimacy . The graceful transition to the shells seems to add a touch of floral pomp to Velázquez’s shadow. The accidents that reside within the imaginary world are comrades to the clown, but they also often symbolize sadness and loneliness. His appearance on stage, hiding tears beneath his mask and feigning laughter, has often been described as an allegory for the artist ‘s guilt. Renoir’s portrayal of Claude as a clown was not a mere whim. Perhaps it was an unconscious expression of the idea that art is about acting or showing. The very existence of a child is a genius, capable of becoming a clown. While Frode was fully immersed in his role as a clown, he also knew somewhere the limitations of acting. His expression contains complex emotions that cannot be expressed simply through cuteness. His gaze seems to gaze into the distance, yet also quietly fixed upon us. It is as if the boy is beginning to realize that his existence is being staged by someone else. A silent accident within the imaginary world lies here. Renoir in his later years and touching bodies. Renoir was 68 years old when this work was written in 1909. In his later years, he suffered from arthritis caused by the Tatsumachi earthquake, and continued to paint with his hand holding the F bandaged and supported by an assistant. Even so, the colors emerging from his F became increasingly bright, soft, and sensual . Painting is not something to be seen, but something to be touched. This belief is borne out in this small portrait . The crease of the fabric, the roundness of the cheek, and even the coldness of the stone background seem to touch the palm of your hand through your gaze . The softness of the child’s skin and the feel of the costume. Perhaps what he sought to recreate was not just a figure, but something closer to a sense. Looking at Claude in his hiero costume, one is drawn to reach out further. This impulse is a call to the senses that transcends a figure. Life and art as a masquerade. This small portrait captures the theatrical aspect of life itself. Wearing a mask and costume, we assume someone’s gaze. Father Renoir holds the F, son Claude plays the clown , and we gaze upon them. In this cycle, art unfolds the structure of appearance: performing, showing, and being seen. This Pierrot by Renoir is not just a commemorative photograph. It is a mixture of love and patience, tradition and conviction, joy and grass. This work is a masquerade itself, quietly revealing the backstage of the theater known as art . As Claude grows older, he explores his own unique style as a film director. He quietly begins to accept his father’s portrait within its context. He continues to search for the accident beneath the mask . This question transcends his father’s and resides in the lives of each of us. “Rough in a Landscape” is a quiet revolutionary work by Renoir, where classical and modern intersect. The soft rustling of the wind melts into the flames, and a lone figure stands there, the rustling of the trees and the drifting clouds standing calmly, as if celebrating her presence. ” Rough in a Landscape,” painted by Hière-Auguste Renoir in 1883, still quietly yet powerfully touches the viewer. This painting, which is both ethereal and reveals the air particles, was created at a time when Renoir was at a turning point as a painter . This painting, now owned by the Musée des Transjulies , attracted attention as part of the two masters who opened the Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025 . This is because, while still tinged with the light of Impressionism, this work embodies the artist ‘s profound determination to approach the classical world. Shining Body: Myth on the Grass. The figure of the blissful Raf is depicted in the center of the canvas. Her back turned to the viewer, her pose at a slight angle, exudes a sense of drama despite her natural surroundings. She is by no means a character who has appeared by chance in a real landscape. Rather, she is an entity that is one with the landscape itself , an image imbued with the powerful force of myth. In his later years, Renoir said, “Boucher’s Diana Desires Water was the first painting that captivated me, and I have loved her like a first love, despite her disability .” This confession quietly permeates Raf in this landscape. The theme of Raf immersed in nature has been repeated by artists like Bauth and Boucher. However, Renoir renews it with a late 19th-century perspective. The Raf depicted by his brush is not merely decorative, but is alive with a physical presence and infinite skill. The Italian sunshine and a reunion with the classics. In 1881, Renoir traveled to Italy. Seeing Picciano and Veronese in Venice and Raphael in Florence awakened a dormant passion for the classics within him. This work, painted after his return, clearly reflects this influence. Until then, Renoir had pursued the sense of air, light, and the moment as an Impressionist knight. However, this painting evokes a universal quality rather than the Impressionist sense of moment. Raf’s body is tightly outlined and shaped by shadows and colors. Like Mal des Ingres, this is a constructive painting that makes us aware of the depiction of the body. This change is not simply a shift in style; for Renoir, it also represented a profound interrogation of the very essence of artistic expression . While he loved light, he began to seek the eternity of form that could not be captured by light alone . Line, form, and soul. Raf’s body in this painting is not simply depicted softly; we can clearly sense his bones, muscles, and the weight of his body. During this period, Renoir focused on shaping through lines, and was fascinated by the beauty of the Ingres-style contours . Certainly, the contours are clear and are drawn with an awareness of the human anatomy. Yet the painting doesn’t feel cold because there’s warmth within the lines. The contours seem to gently touch the skin, the shadows seem to envelop the viewer. Renoir’s brushwork lovingly infuses the canvas, almost as if caressing the body. As a result, her body appears not merely as a material object but as a living form. The wind and winds of the fields and the sunlight reflect off her skin, creating a subtle flow of time within the painting. Bridging the gap between obscurity and modernity, Raff’s prowess in landscape paintings isn’t simply due to his proximity to classical forms. This painting clearly demonstrates Renoir’s admiration for 18th-century Rococo art. The philosophical scenes of horses and Boucher’s spectacle-inspired water scenes take on new life in his hands. However, the Rococo here is not an imitation of the past; rather, it is a modern Rococo, reconstructed through Renoir’s own personal refinement . Rather than the dramatic ambience of the Baroque, it is a world filled with intimacy and gentle air. Raff becomes one with the landscape, quietly embracing the viewer. This was also the beginning of modernism. Renoir crossed the two great traditions of classical and impressionism to build his own kingdom of beauty. This endeavor was later carried on by Matisse, Picasso, Bonnard, and Buhiert. Dialogue with the Present in an Exhibition: At the 2025 exhibition at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in Tokyo, his rough sketches in landscapes once again attracted the attention of many. In modern times, the rough motif is sometimes associated with a consumerist gaze . However, standing before this work by Renoir, such a feeling instantly disappears. What emerges from the canvas is the human form, a communion with nature. Rather than dominating with one’s gaze , the interloper feels as if they are immersed in the artist’s serene presence. This is the quietest power of art. The fact that such a work exists here today is not merely a mere display of one of the artist’s works; it is also proof that the richness of seeing, feeling, and loving has been transmitted through time. Finally, to paint the body is to paint the soul. For Renoir, painting the body is to paint light. He continued to draw rough sketches until his final years, as if to touch the soul. His rough sketches in landscapes are one of his starting points, a bridge from Impressionism to Classicism, and a personal, primal landscape. The figure of the rough, blending seamlessly into the landscape, speaks quietly across the ages : “I believe in your power of vision.” Intervention is not about casting a gaze, but rather about opening your heart. Renoir’s F, the sentiment he imbued with this work— that moment when skin seemed translucent in the sunlight—was not simply a rough sketch. It embodied his faith in the joy of life. And it gently accompanies us as we live our lives today. The long, divine restraints, the qualities of Renoir’s brush, seem to speak. At the back of the room, the sink curtain gently sways. Standing there is a woman, stroking a long piece of paper with a raspberry. Her presence, soft and quiet, embraces the viewer’s heart, as if the morning’s tranquility had taken on a human form. This long, paper-length painting , currently housed at the Musée de l’Orangerie in Paris, was painted by Pierre-Auguste Renoir around 1895. It fully captures Renoir’s signature mellowness , his rich, radiant skin tones, and, above all, his love for the female body . However, this work is more than simply a spectacle or a celebration of the body. It also seems to embody the artist’s final year’s artistic endeavors. As in “Bath, Light, and Madromes Afternoons,” Renoir’s lustrous women sometimes appear by the river, sometimes in the bathroom, and sometimes indoors. In all cases, however, they seem to exist somewhere in a dream. Even in this long, paper-length painting, the background is vague, creating a portrait rather than a snapshot of reality. The light is soft, the air meltingly warm . While the dripping water from the model’s hair is not depicted, the humidity and texture of their presence are palpable, even to the viewer’s skin. Her body, like a flower petal steeped in a light , glows with a radiant glow. What is she thinking now, what dreams is she having? The moment they part belongs to a different dimension from our own time. Time stands still, space dissolves, and the sheer beauty brings a deep sense of peace to the viewer. There is something special about the time of a woman captured by Efde, the time of dissolving a woman’s hair. These are the words of a poet, but Renoir must have had a similar perfection. The model in this work rests her hand on her own paper, a quiet, slightly engrossed expression on her face . We cannot stand that expression, for she is completely immersed in her own time. What we see there is not a body that exists to be looked at, but a living body. Gakarnoğlu has captured such a moment in Efde, almost as if in prayer. A realm of reckless beauty, somewhere late in life, far removed from the murmurs of the world. This is the time of the long suppression of paper. There is no acting or malfunction in the model’s presence. It is the artist and This is perhaps a testament to the trust he developed with his model. The artist never seeks to consume the woman; instead, he simply listens to her beauty and respects her body as an extension of nature. Cocur’s sense of color, the light of skin, reaches its peak in this work . Since the Impressionist period, he had consistently studied the behavior of color under light. However, in the 1890s, Renoir began to consider a more classical sense of form, often painting luminous female figures modeled after Rubens and Picciano. In this work, too, color is no longer a reflection of the subject; it is itself another skin that constitutes the body. The depiction of the skin, with its blends of pink , orange, variegated colors, and subtle blues and greens , floats across the canvas as if breathing. The light melts softly along the curves of her body, and the shadows sink deep. The warmth of Renoir’s hand is also evident in the way he applies the paint. The smooth, gentle strokes are never sharp, but rather create a soft, relaxed rhythm. Through the natural form of the body, he sought to unite beauty and happiness. Another long piece of paper similar to this work is currently housed at the Barnes Foundation in the United States. Paulum contributed greatly to the collection. Paulum was the founder of the Musée de l’Orangerie , a devout follower of the poet Apollinaire in his youth, and a dedicated collector of contemporary art. He recognized the value of Renoir’s work early on and played a key role in bringing modern French painting to the world. Albert Seaver is known as one of America’s most passionate collectors of the first half of the 20th century . His strong commitment to new beauty and education continues to be passed down through the Barnes Foundation today . Barnes, Barnes, and Renoir. These three figures, caught at the crossroads of these three, engage in a dialogue that transcends words in the quiet paintings. There are no borders, no eras , and no languages. They are connected only by their gazes, which gaze upon beauty. What will we inherit in this exhibition-like time? This long paper painting was exhibited at the 2025 exhibition of the two great artists, Renoir x Sézanne, held at the Mitsubishi Art Museum in Tokyo, drawing the attention of many visitors. The soft lighting of the venue brought the painting ‘s beauty to life, gently speaking to us today. Each visitor stopped before the painting and simply gazed at it. At that moment, her presence was reborn in the present. In the quiet space of the museum, the visitor becomes a traveler, freely moving between the past and the present. Art is truly an experience that transcends time. Furthermore, such an exhibition is not simply an opportunity to view paintings; it also symbolizes the act of inheritance itself. Renoir’s beauty, once gazed upon by dreams and believed in by Barnes, is a cultural light that we must now inherit . Finally, the joy of seeing. Renoir’s long paper painting lacks a grand structure or dramatic narrative. Yet, precisely for this reason, this painting reminds us of the essential joy of the act of seeing . Seeing is the first door between the world and ourselves. As we gaze upon her, perhaps she too is gazing back at the serenity within us . This woman, painted by Renoir with a F-number, speaks to us even after 100 years: beauty is here and now. Beauty is the power to sense and the heart to resonate. And as long as this resonance is passed on to the next generation, spiritual arts will continue. This long-standing divine desire is a witness to this quiet miracle. There are moments, hidden within the smile, when I pause, drawing near Renoir’s Portrait of a Young Man and Girl, and the flow of time seems to slow down. Standing before the painting, I feel as if my gaze is being drawn deep into the canvas. The extraordinary resonance of the colors, the light that feels like it touches my skin, the determined clusters of brushstrokes. This is the quiet yet certain experience that comes when I look at Pierre-Augusse and Renoir’s Portrait of a Young Man and Girl. This work was painted in 1876, when Renoir was a member of the Impressionist movement. The two figures, a young man and a young girl, float alone in the canvas without exchanging glances. Their personalities are vague and the details of their expressions are hazy like mist, but this in turn evokes a rich sense of richness. The snapshot-like composition seems merely coincidental, but in fact is a mature couple’s composition by Renoir, who brilliantly captures light and atmosphere. The portrait’s passing gazes give the first impression of a somewhat silly appearance. The man in red gazes at the angled hairstyle, while the girl, neither staring straight ahead nor staring off into space, seems to wander. There is no conversation or exchange between the two. They stand silently side by side in the canvas, as if living in completely different times . Yet, it is this mysterious emptiness that gives the work its certainty. Renoir did not depict intimacy or emotional exchange, but rather sought to capture the invisible, the shining moment of a chance glance. He captured the two figures in a fleeting composition, like the moment the shutter clicks . Behind their still poses, light and time pulse . Perhaps the greatest magic in Courcourt-le-Noir’s paintings, a blend of color and brushstrokes, lies in his ability to capture the air. Outlines are unclear, colors blend softly, and backgrounds often melt so easily that they are indistinguishable. Yet this ambiguity is by no means sloppy. Rather, it conveys the most sincere presence of things in the air. In this work, too, the two figures blend into the background, enveloped in particles of light. Light permeates the girl’s white blouse, while shadows are layered on the young man’s dark clothing, creating an endless, soft gradation. The contours of their faces, hair, and hands seem almost to disappear, further deepening the presence of the figures. This treatment of color is a clear example of the Impressionist movement. Rather than clearly recording shapes, Renoir pursued the shifts in color and light that his eyes perceived. His approach, rather than capturing a moment in a painting, was to revive a sense of holiness through the moment. Light reflects off skin, is absorbed into fabric, and dissolves into air . He captured these subtle changes with his brush. Georges Rivière as model . The model for the young man in this painting is thought to be art critic Georges Rivière, a close friend and enthusiastic supporter of Renoir . He championed the unrecognized Impressionist painters of the 1870s and invited them to appear at the Salon. Rivière frequently appears in Renoir’s works, suggesting an intimate relationship exists in the background of his work. However, in the painting, he is depicted as a person, not a friend. His figure is quiet and introspective, as if lingering in someone ‘s memory. Renoir neither idealizes nor dramatizes him; he simply observes his presence with a calm gaze. Beyond portraiture , the appeal of this work lies in its ambiguity of the portrait genre. Despite the two faces at its center, this is not a typical portrait . Emphasis on social status or professional individuality is abandoned; only the presence of the people floating in the light is depicted. Renoir focused on capturing the atmosphere of the moment, rather than the external or internal aspects of the characters . This is why this work takes on a different expression with each intervention. On a sunny day, the painting appears to smile; on a cloudy day, it appears to be a strange and serious expression. It gives the illusion of the figure responding to the viewer’s emotional state. Renoir is said to have once said that he would rather paint wallpaper than paint a picture of sadness . This was not a reflection of his pursuit of superficial pleasures, but rather a reflection of his belief in the fate of life through art. This portrait of a young man and girl is not at all sentimental, but rather exudes a quiet blessing. How precious this serenity is to us today. In an age where words abound, images judge, and all information is consumed haphazardly , Renoir’s paintings simply exist without saying a word. Perhaps the essence of art resides in this silence . Being exhibited speaks to us now. This work, presented to Japanese audiences as part of the exhibition Renoir x Cézanu Moda, to be held at the Mitsubishi Ichigokan Museum of Art in 2025, will see the two figures in the painting meet our eyes across nearly 150 years. Their silence, depicted in the painting, is in fact a question. Do you remember this light, that quiet afternoon you spent with someone? Can you recall what a portrait represents to you? When we encounter this painting in the quintessential space of a museum, we are likely to be confronted with our own memories. Gazes shared with others, unspoken emotions, and moments so dear because they are vague. All of these are evoked by this portrait. This painting is a mirror that reflects the gazer’s heart, like a pair of eyebrows that warmly embraces time gone by. We find in it a sense of life, not a record. Finally, the portrait of the young man and girl does not depict any particular event. Just two people standing side by side . Trying to understand why this simple image resonates so deeply with us, Tae smiles quietly. It is not based on logic; even as times change and values fluctuate, these paintings continue to speak quietly but surely. They are waiting for the moment when we pause and listen to the light and shadow. And at that moment, another eternal spring will bloom within us. Renoir’s work, “English Pear Tree,” evokes a nostalgic yet undeniably new form: a place where the fruit thrives in the sunlight, where the wind blows through the green teeth, gently touching the earth as if touching the skin. While many have fantasies of Paris, here, a different time flows. Its nature is gentle, and there is only the song of light and color . Louvesieng, where Renoir painted “English Pear Tree,” was just such a place. The painters of the 1870s, including Sisley, Bissarro, and Renoir, also escaped the hustle and bustle of the city and retreated to nature. Louvesieng, not far from Paris , is a paradise of trees and orchards, a perfect studio for them . Walking through this town, the swaying of the leaves overlaps with the movement of the painting, and anyone will agree that the sweetness of the fruit guided the color choices. Renoir’s “English Pear Tree” is a song that captures the memory of such a season. Painting Light: Impressionist Masterpiece The first thing one notices when viewing this painting is the way the light is present. There is no sun itself depicted. However, the light reflecting off the trees and spilling onto the ground, a luminosity that vibrates the air, permeates every corner of the painting. Like the Impressionists, Renoir did not rely on traditional contours and shadows, but instead sought to enclose the world through the manipulation of light and color. Here, too, his work is soft and pale, almost like a pine tree. The green of the trees is never uniform, but changes color with the changing mood of the sky, sometimes tinged with yellow and sometimes sunken blue . As the light filtering through the trees strikes the ground and reflects back, the landscape appears to breathe. The English pear tree is both the name of the family tree and symbolizes the large tree that is the main character of this painting. The tree’s bold branches spread from right to left, creating a green heaven that envelops the entire painting and a sheltering canopy for the characters. Its sheer size, which seems to stretch beyond the frame, emphasizes its presence and invites our imagination beyond the canvas. Either the people are absent, or we simply don’t notice their presence. A careful look at the center of the painting reveals three figures. One appears to be sitting, while the other is standing or crouching. The colors of their clothing blend with the grass and trees in the background, obscuring the church. It’s unclear what they’re doing . Yet, here lies Renoir’s diva. Humans are depicted as part of the landscape, presenting themselves as natural beings. Rather than telling a particular drama or story , the landscape itself is presented as a moment in time. These people may be resting under a pear tree, carrying fruit, or simply immersed in the light, quietly feeling the breeze. In any case, their presence is not merely an adjunct to the landscape, but as a part of it. Color Harmony: Renoir’s Personal Perfection. For Renoir, color was n’t merely a qualifying element; it was a voice connected to emotion and memory. In the English pear trees, yellow-green and bright blue are delicately layered, and sunlight permeates the entire painting. Renoir was beginning to master Impressionist techniques during this period, but his own unique warm color sense was already evident . Particularly noteworthy is the depiction of shadows on the ground. They are not simply black or gray. Translucent purples and browns are used, making even the shadows appear as part of the light. This delicate depiction would later lead to the light of Renoir’s skin. The tree’s stems and branches lack hardness; everything is contained within a soft, luminous palette. The Impressionist conviction can be seen in the way the space is constructed as a plane of color, rather than capturing objects with lines. A Step Toward Quiet Modernism: 1873. 1873 was a time just before the birth of Impressionism . The first official Impressionist exhibition was held in 1874, but artists were already believing in their own credentials and sensibilities and attempting to break away from traditional academicism . Renoir was also in the midst of this. This work embodies a conviction not so much in the subject matter as in the act of looking itself . The Pear Tree is not great. Yet Renoir painted it with such care and boldness, as if he cherished it. It’s as if the moment spent under the tree were the whole of life. Renoir was poor at the time and his paintings didn’t sell well. Yet, works like this reveal his deep trust in the beauty and joy he perceived with his own eyes . The two great masters, Renoir x Cézanne, opened the Renoir x Cézanne Moderna exhibition at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. This work, a serene English pear tree, exudes a quiet yet poignant presence. Unlike Cézanne’s upright construction, Renoir’s gaze, filled with the joy of seeing, is relatable to us living today. Busy with work, surrounded by information, and hurried by daily life, how often do we pay attention to the simple appearance of a tree and the warmth of its light? Renoir gently poses this question. Someone is smiling beneath the tree . Teeth dance in the wind, the light sparkles. There’s no reason for this scene . It’s beautiful simply because it exists. Finally, “The English Pear Tree” is more of a landscape painting than a painting, speaking to the heart. Renoir captured a moment in everyday life and painted it with a timeless touch. There is no righteous deed or imposed narrative. There is simply the quiet, gentle presence of people, light, and color living in the landscape. The afternoon light that nurtures the pears spreads throughout the gaff. It’s the kind of work that makes us want to sit in its shadow and listen for a moment to the world’s stillness . Renoir’s Algerian landscape, in the sunlight, closes its eyes , and the breeze caresses its skin, carrying the scent of a distant exotic land. The sandy air of the desert, the green of the cacti reflecting the blue of the sky. Renoir must have sensed the breath of this land before his brushstrokes even touched it. In 1881, Renoir and Pierre-Augustus traveled to Algeria. It was more than just a visit to a foreign land; for him, it was a pilgrimage in search of the origins of color and light. The Algerian landscape, “The Church of Hamsauvage,” was born during this journey. The painting was written in a religious town called Pam Sauvage, located outside Algiers . The name is said to have originated from a nearby café restaurant. However, the sound of the name seems to speak of the natural beauty and hidden vitality of the land itself . Renoir turned 40 that year and set off for the exotic land of Algeria. Though already renowned as a leading Impressionist painter, he was also facing its limitations. While the paintings of the Impressionists were consistently criticized for their lack of composition, Renoir was searching for a new style. It was at this time that he decided to travel to Algeria . Eugène Delacroix was in his mind. The 19th-century Romantic master visited Algeria in 1832 and treasured the experience for the rest of his life. Delacroix wrote in his diary about the astonishing natural richness of the land . Renoir, too, was seeking that same astonishing experience. The moment he stepped out of Algiers airport, he must have immediately noticed the difference in the quality of the wind blowing from the Synod . Low humidity air, vibrant blue, and vibrant flowers on dry rock surfaces. Renoir’s senses were all in one place. His canvas absorbed all of these and became a source of light that reflected them . Searching for color, this work features plants unique to the Mediterranean coast, such as cactus and aloe. The painting is densely written. This is not merely a landscape depiction; it is a symphony of colors, resonating with each other . Please take a look. The entire canvas is covered with a rich green and eau de vie ground, followed by a bright cobalt blue. The blue of the sky and shadows is particularly striking. The blending of the notations creates depth within the shadows. Here, blue is not a symbol of coldness, but rather another face of the earth, touched by light and heat . The texture is also incredibly dense. It contrasts sharply with the light-footed brushstrokes Renoir used during his Impressionist period . One can see a strong desire to clearly capture the contours of light and form . There is a strangeness to classical constructivity, a reaffirmation of the individual. Symbolized by the reputation of the Pas-Sauvage Catholic country as the origin of modern painting seen abroad , there is a wildness here. It is neither virgin nor atomic. Rather, it is the original pure form before the intrusion of civilization . Perhaps Renoir saw in this form the roots of the sacred that modern French society had nearly forgotten . This was a time when urbanization was progressing and the Paris salons were focused solely on technique and form. In this work, Renoir superimposed the humble state of human existence onto each individual plant breathing in the sun . This intimate dialogue with nature is something he shared with Cézanne. While Renoir and Cézanne are sometimes considered contrasting painters, they shared a common approach: learning from and engaging with nature . The two masters who opened this exhibition, “Renoir x Cézanne Modern,” also quietly speak of this spiritual authenticity. Another fascinating aspect of this work is the way in which Renoir captures light. The Algerian sun is completely different from the soft sunlight of Paris. It is dazzling and dry, sharply highlighting the contours of the subject. Despite struggling with this light, Renoir manipulates its effects with astonishing freedom. For example, the car parked on the rock face in the center of the painting is not merely a play on light and shadow; it dominates the entire composition . The contrast between where light shines and where shadow falls brings rhythm and breath to the painting. There is an almost musical movement here. Rather than capturing nature , he is rescuing the struggles within it. The Unwritten Presence of Humanity What is intriguing about this work is the absence of any human figures. Renoir is known as a master of portraiture . Here, however, he dispenses with human figures, allowing nature to speak for itself. However, that does not mean that there is a complete absence of human presence. Rather, the entire landscape is imbued with a certain masculinity. As one gazes at the work, one is seized by the illusion that someone is looking back at oneself from afar. Perhaps this is the memory of the land itself, a vestige of people who once lived, spoke, and loved there. As the name Femme Sauvage suggests, it is unclear whether a wild woman once lived there. However, the living presence of this land is certainly brought to life by Renoir’s brush. Renoir’s gaze shifts. This work marked a clear shift in Renoir’s style. His experience in Algeria was not simply a sensual exoticism; it renewed the artist’s philosophy of photography . After his return from his travels, his works began to display firmer contours and carefully constructed compositions. At first glance, this may seem like a departure from the softness of Impressionism . But in fact, behind this work lies a dawning passion for light and color. Baptized by the light of Algeria, Renoir was no longer the same Renoir he once was. His style had shifted from a complete appreciation of nature to a rigorous construction of nature. Finally, “Memories of Sunshine: Algerian Landscape, Pam Sauvage, Church of the Church” is not simply a landscape painting. It is a testament to the transition of the painting’s own style and a record of an adventure in light and color. It also asks us questions about what landscape is, what nature is, and what it means to see . Renoir discovered the pure, untouched, and overwhelming essence of seeing not in a southern port city or a street corner in Paris, but in Algiers . This is nothing less than the illuminating message of art that he spent his life searching for. Now, as we stand before this work, we too are bathed in that light. The sunlight shining into this painting, more than 14 years later, gently illuminates our membranes and our hearts. The body of wind and light is Renoir’s work, sailing around the island of Ghan, a shellfish on the other side of the waves. It may have been a late summer afternoon. The sky was pale, and sunlight softly poured over the sea. Standing on the shore, the painting gazed intently out to sea. The rhythm of the waves, the color of the sky, the trembling of the air reflected in the water. Everything quietly yet surely sinks into the painting through his eyes and heart. Ale Auguste Renoir’s 1883 painting, “The Accountant’s Guern,” captures just such a moment, as wind, light, and color work together. There is no specific story to be told. No one appears in the painting. The landscape simply breathes as it is. Here, the painting becomes a wordless song. Rhythm, butterflies, inspiration, and silence. These create a beautiful song of the wind. The setting, Guern, is a Channel Island in the English Channel. Guern, one of these, held a special place in Renoir’s heart. In the summer of 1883, he spent several weeks on the island, where he dedicated himself to painting before the landscape of sea, sky, and rocks . By this time, he was already known as an Impressionist painter, but he was also increasingly interested in form and structure, exploring how to balance the depiction of light with the composition of a painting. One of his paintings, Sea Island, captures the rocky surface, sea, and sky of the island in a single canvas, overlooking the island’s cliffs. Nothing particularly dramatic is happening . Yet there is a clear desire to sense the landscape. His approach is not just to paint shapes, but to listen to the pulse of nature flowing through them. This is the true nature of the landscape, which faintly permeates the entire canvas. The sea and sky in the painting depict a complex network of rock formations. Burnt browns, stony blues, and yellows blend to convey the rugged texture of the rocks. Between the rocks, the deep blue-green sea peeks out. The moment the waves break and disperse into white foam is vividly depicted. From the horizon to the horizon, the sea gradually transforms into the sky. The blue swirls smoothly, drawing the eye toward the sky. Renoir’s sky is never merely a background. It, too, is filled with soft, trembling light, and the shapes of the clouds regulate the painting’s rhythm. This expansive palette is a testament to Renoir’s signature artistic perfection. He pursued not just concrete, but the harmony of color and form , and how to evoke the senses. This is why the sky, sea, and rocks resonate with each other like a public sphere in “Garnet.” A shift in landscape perspective: As an Impressionist, Renoir often painted urban landscapes of Paris and social gatherings along the Blue Sea coast. However, from this period onward, he began to develop an interest in purer natural landscapes, and “Garnet” marks one such turning point. Here, human figures are omitted , and nature itself takes center stage. What he sought to portray in this painting is not merely a landscape; it is a record of an extremely sensitive experience, one in which one engages with the landscape before one’s eyes and senses sounds, scents, and even temperature. Seeing is not merely a physical act, but an act that is felt with the entire body; this work is permeated with an awareness of this sensory experience . A closer look reveals the rhythm of Renoir’s brushstrokes, characteristic of Renoir. Short, light strokes depict the movement of the waves and the undulating rocks. The way the strokes seem to directly convey the speed of the wind and the movement of the sea is a characteristic of Impressionism. However, Renoir’s brushwork also possesses a certain sculptural quality. While the gold lines are unclear, the overlapping of colors and the arrangement of light and dark create a clear structure within the canvas. This is an element that echoes his interest in the great masters he admired during this period, such as Raphael and Ingres . Thus, “The Island of the Treasurer” strikes us as a work that combines Impressionist lightness with classical structure . What he sees in the sea. Looking at this work, one is suddenly drawn to the other side. The horizon stretches beyond the waves, and beyond that lies a landscape yet unseen. Standing before it, this compositional construction brings a philosophical dimension to the landscape. While depicting what is visible, it allows us to sense what is unseen. It leaps from the concrete to the imaginary. This is the meaning of Renoir’s landscape painting. His brush paints rocks, sea and sky, and at the same time, he writes a place that does not exist anywhere. It is both a memory and a vision of the future. Such a sense of distance certainly exists within the quiet, serene canvas . It is a message to us today. It is particularly significant that this work will be exhibited as part of the Renoir x Sézanu Moda exhibition at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art, Tokyo, in 2025. When we, living in the slums of the city , stop and face this landscape, the time that passes there seems completely different from that of our modern times . It feels as though a breeze is blowing from the canvas before us. The rocks, waves, and air of the island reach deep into our souls. At that moment, we step away from the boundaries of our everyday lives and step into another world. It is as if we are regaining lost sensations. Renoir’s “The Island of Guernsey” is not simply a beautiful painting; it is a song of the landscape that quietly stirs the viewer’s heart. In the end, we are with the landscape . When Pierre-Auguste Renoir took up his brush on the shores of Guernsey, he was in love with the landscape and surrendered to it. The painting, with his pencil and pencil pencils, is a fragment of that memory, a record of a quiet dialogue between nature and humanity. Standing before this painting, we forget words for a moment. It is as if we can hear the sound of paper from the canvas. It is as if light is filtering through the gaps in the brushstrokes. We then accept the landscape Renoir must have seen as our own memory. In this way, the painting continues to transcend time. It is both a landscape and a portrait . It gently teaches us that paintings can become songs . Renoir’s “Song of Silent Waters” (The Bridge of the Sainte River) is a timeless piece of music, transcending words. The blue side, just before sunrise, is particularly quiet and, above all, beautiful . Renoir’s “The Bridge of the Sainte River” (The Bridge of the Sainte River) is a work that captures a moment of time. Just as rapeseed breathes on a cabbage, the river lies breathless at the bottom. This work is said to have been painted in the late 1860s, just before the Impressionist movement . Before the term “Impressionism” appeared ironically in the newspaper market, Claude Monet and Renoir worked side by side, exploring the possibilities of landscapes. In this sense, ” The Bridge on the Blue River” is a culmination of the great Impressionist movement, a painting imbued with a tranquil presence . A narrative hidden within a waterfront landscape, the Blue River flows through the center of the painting. A black bridgeboat drifts lightly on the shore, seemingly asleep, shifting its form in the river. The surrounding area is unadorned, and the boat has a simple form as a means of transportation, but Renoir ‘s brushwork gives its outline a soft, gentle quality. Small buildings can be seen on the riverbank. Whether they are private homes or warehouses is unclear, but they blend into the landscape and are merely depicted as background elements. At the same time, the canvas is open , drawing the viewer’s gaze into the distant haze of the river. This sense of depth is precisely what Renoir sought to express in painting from his early days. The sky is not blue; rather, a cloudy, almost leaden, sky covers the entire painting. Yet this is what gives this landscape its distinctive, dignified beauty. The water’s surface is calm and natural precisely because the sun is not shining directly on it. A memory of a collaborative work by Renoir and Monet. Around 1869, when Renoir painted “The Bridge on the River Sainte,” he often traveled abroad with Claude Monet. Their favorite destinations were Saint-Brugebal and Toargenteuil in the west of Paris. They set up their easels side by side, facing the same landscape, and worked their painters, tracing the changes in light. This artistic approach would later become a core characteristic of Impressionism, but at the time, it represented experimentation , challenge, and, above all, a yearning for freedom. Renoir’s “The Bridge on the River Sainte” also reflects this free-flowing approach. The composition is relaxed, and what permeates the entire canvas is a sense of feeling, not theory. Rather than faithfully capturing the details of nature , the painting’s structure is defined by a gaze that seeks to capture light, air, and the flow of time. Let’s take a look at Chimelnoir’s brushstrokes of the water and air. The bridge over the Sacred Pond does not yet display the gentle qualities of his advanced years, but it already exudes a sensitivity for capturing the interplay of matter and light . The depiction of the water is subtly notched, as if a gentle breeze is caressing the water. There is no sound in the painting, but one can clearly hear the sounds of sloshing water and a sinking boat. Air is also part of the painting. The colors are generally subdued, which makes the humidity and diffused light permeating the canvas more clearly. The texture of the air behind them is emphasized more than the color itself. While Renoir would later paint figures and flowers in more vibrant colors, in this work he is intent on listening to the breath of the landscape. The bridge over the Sacred River, set in the dreary future, appears at first glance to be a modest scene . It is neither a tourist attraction nor a flashy composition. Yet, this painting harbors a foreshadowing of a coming artistic revolution. Renoir is gazing at a scene from everyday life with a sense of community. This perspective would later shape Impressionism. This painting is not merely a depiction of a bridge. The lives of working people, the waterfront landscape, and the intersection of city and nature are all expressed in silence. By depicting this landscape as it is , without embellishment, Renoir presented art that celebrates a gentleness that gently penetrates the viewer’s heart. His leap to Impressionism: A few years after this work was created, in 1874, the so-called First Impressionist Exhibition was held. Renoir was one of the exhibitors and had already begun working independently with his colleagues. However, early works such as The Bridge on the Saint River still show the influence of Academism, clearly demonstrating how Renoir sought to break away from the traditional framework of art. What he attempted here was, in a sense, a rediscovery of seeing itself: not a fixed technique, but a fluctuating gaze, not the outline of an object, but the quality of light. This painting, situated between classical and modernism, serves as a valuable record of a moment in Renoir’s artistic evolution. To encounter this painting in a museum… This piece, The Bridge on the Saint-Neuil River, will be exhibited in Japan from the Maison d’Orsay at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025, as part of the Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition by these two masters . Facing this tranquil riverscape in the heart of Tokyo, we are suddenly called to pause in the midst of our turbulent modern times. Renoir’s brushstrokes—the serene, calming bridge over the Takakawa River, the weight of the air, the presence of the sky—still speak to us today , even after more than 150 years. It’s a quiet, serene, yet truly living landscape, a painting and a song at the same time. The Bridge on the Saint-Neuil River is not one of Renoir’s most famous works, but it embodies a sensibility that could be said to be at the heart of his work . Finding beauty in unassuming landscapes— perhaps it is here that the spirit of Impressionism throbs. A gentle breeze must have been blowing on the banks of the Neuil River on the day Renoir painted this painting. That breeze still lingers within the painting, gently infusing its way into our hearts. A work by Auguste and Renoir. Snow Expressions, a momentary cold, a marketplace for people. Renoir’s sensual aspirations, emerging from the wind’s gaffe , were a rare find among Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s works, a period when the 1870s painters were pursuing the depiction of nature and the effects of light . While Renoir is known for his sun-soaked gardens, waterside décor, and, above all, the soft expressions and colors of his female and child figures, this work depicts a cold, dignified world. This work was exhibited at the Renoir x Cézanne Moderne exhibition held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025 , drawing the attention of many visitors. This is because the subject of Snow Expressions was one of Renoir’s few subjects throughout his life. A limited depiction of winter. I was vulnerable to the cold. As Renoir himself said, he hated the cold and rarely painted winter expressions. He also said of Ambroise Vollard: “I was vulnerable to the cold, so this is the only winter landscape I can think of.” I also remember three small pieces. This statement is a good indication of how the sense of seasons affected Renoir’s work. In contrast to fellow Impressionists such as Monet and Pisaro, who often depicted landscapes shrouded in mist or snow reflections, winter was not a familiar theme for Renoir. As such, snow occupies a prominent place in his oeuvre. This work is not merely a snowy landscape; it is a deeply personal and challenging work that transcends cold. Composition and Color: Warmth Residing in White: This work depicts a tranquil, snow-covered landscape. The birds shed their feathers, their dark branches reaching toward the sky, while the ground is blanketed in warm snow. In the circle, farmhouses and small buildings with snow-covered roofs are depicted with soft contours, creating an overall atmosphere of melancholy. Renoir treats the white of snow not simply as achromatic , but as a medium for capturing subtle variations in light and shadow. The richness of the color, with subtle hints of pink, blue, and pale gray interspersed within the white, does not betray his typical use of color. The soft light shining in the far right corner of the canvas evokes a warmth of winter sunlight, providing a pleasant aftertaste. This handling of light and color is a truly characteristic of Renoir . His attempt to find warmth within the cold, rather than pushing it away, elevates this work to an even more remarkable level. The work’s attempt at Impressionist technique, combined with the improvisational brushwork characteristic of the Impressionists of the 1870s, is evident in the composition. The sky and snowy ground are painted with quick, layered strokes of paint, thinly spread across the canvas, while the tree branches and the house in the background are rendered with a rough yet precise precision. The composition is deliberately designed to create depth, naturally drawing the eye from the foreground to the circular arc . The vertical placement of several trees on the flat snowy surface adds rhythm and tension to the canvas. The asymmetrical composition also demonstrates Renoir’s free and flexible execution. While the composition appears improvised at first glance, it is in fact highly calculated. Along with Mo and Sisley, Renoir studied the Barbizon School’s sense of nature, and this compositional power is the result of combining that sense of nature with Impressionist-style depictions of momentary moments. Comparing his works with those of his contemporaries, Renoir’s view of winter. 1875 marked the early period in Renoir’s career, when he began participating in Impressionist exhibitions. Around this time, Monet painted snowy landscapes at the Argens baths, and Pissarro also captured winter laborers in Pontoise . These works use snow as a medium to observe the everyday life of cities and rural villages, projecting changes in light and a sense of everyday life. Meanwhile, Renoir’s snow scenes are intensely sexual and lack human figures. As such, they are somewhat melodramatic, resembling landscapes from memory. For Renoir, winter may have been chosen as a setting for his early personal paintings, rather than as a revolutionary depiction of nature . Though he only painted a few works on this theme, there’s no doubt that it left a deep impression on him. Position in the exhibition: Renoir’s Winter Reputation. This work, Snow, is unusual for Renoir and serves as a valuable resource for tracing the evolution of his style. His essential qualities as a painter—his commitment to color, his intense lightness, and his expression of airiness— are accentuated within the constraints of the winter landscape. Recent research has highlighted such works as a key to rediscovering the artist’s inner self and the breadth of his expression. At the 2025 exhibition, Snow was also presented as an important work showcasing another facet of Renoir, known as a painter of sunlight . Furthermore, the theme of winter was an important theme for Impressionism, and the ability to capture color within a white canvas was a test of an artist’s skill. In that sense, this work reaffirms Renoir’s mastery of color . What a Single Snowflake Speaks: Snow is by no means Renoir’s masterpiece. However, precisely for this reason , his personal touch and sincere commitment to overseas pursuits are quietly yet reliably present in this work. This is a fleeting scene that Renoir, a painter who was sensitive to the cold and avoided winter, could not resist painting . It is the result of his love for nature, which overcame temporary inconveniences and hardships. When viewing this work, viewers are naturally drawn to take a deep breath . Amid the cold and gloom, a hint of warm light and color lingers. This is the snow scene that Renoir was observing. Pierre-Auguste Renoir ‘s work also combines the joy of everyday life with color. Pierre-Auguste Renoir is one of the most beloved Impressionist painters. His works, depicting the joy of people’s lives, figures and landscapes bathed in light, and beautifully colored creatures, evoke a sense of warmth and richness . Among Renoir’s works, this 1881 painting is filled with a sense of intimacy that is distinct from the elegant figures. This work was painted during Renoir’s stay in Normandy with the family of his friend Paul Bérard, and depicts a gentle creature reminiscent of a scene from the Bérard family’s daily life. Renoir’s hand has digested the scene of a mundane family dinner table, featuring a white bowl on a white tablecloth and peaches within. Through this seemingly ordinary yet profound work, Peaches, we explore Renoir’s exploration of aesthetic color in his biological paintings and his unique identity within the Impressionist movement. We will also consider the work’s role in the context of the Renoir x Cézanne 10 exhibition, which will be held at the Mitsubishi Ichigokan Museum of Art in 2025. The year of this work, 1881, marks a period when Renoir stepped away from his Impressionist activities and began to explore his own unique style. During his travels to Italy, he encountered the rigorous forms of La Haero and Renaissance art, which led him to confront fundamental questions about the meaning of life. Shortly before this, he spent time at Paul Bérard’s estate, Villeneuve-l’Avignon, in Normandy, northern France, where he produced numerous works. Bérard was a diplomat and patron of the arts. For Renoir, his days at the Bérard household were precious, allowing him to concentrate on painting in a quiet environment surrounded by nature . The works he created there strongly reflect the richness and intimacy of life. Peaches is one such example. The simple subject matter—the white Delftware tableware commonly used at the Bérard house, the white tablecloth, and the fruit served on the table— takes on a deeper meaning in its universality. What is beauty ? Renoir speaks to this not in luxury or the dramatic, but in the everyday, not in the everyday . The composition is extremely simple . In the center of the painting is a white bowl containing several peaches. Beneath it is a white tablecloth, and in the background is a colorful decorative pattern. This immaculate composition actually embodies a balanced, well-placed image. The white bowl and the peach within it are stably positioned in the center of the composition, naturally drawing the eye toward the soft texture and color of the fruit. The subtle diagonal lines of the table surface and tablecloth create depth and flow to the painting. The wallpaper or tapestry and decorative pattern in the background are painted in clear colors of blue, red, wood, and green, while the soft orange and white of the peach’s skin create a richer, more ethereal rhythm. Despite the simple composition, the overall harmony of color and shape, like a musical piece, creates a sense of pleasure unique to living things. Renoir’s unique style lies above all in his sense of color and brushwork. In this work, the soft layering of colors and the depiction of light are used extremely effectively . The surface of the peach is a blend of orange, red, yellow, and a slight green , creating a texture that almost evokes the scent of ripe fruit. Renoir’s style is by no means high-pitched; rather, it has a softness that feels like color is being applied to skin rather than painted . As a result, the fruit appears to be enveloped in light and air rather than merely existing . Subtle variations in color are also evident in the depiction of the white ball and cross. Instead of solid white, blue, gray, or blue-purple are used to express the thickness and shadows of the objects. The colors used in the background patterns are also by no means flat, but rather have subtle notations that match the brush strokes, adding vitality to the picture. In this way, Renoir’s approach is not to paint shapes through color, but to create form and space through color itself. This is a fundamental principle of Impressionism, but in Renoir’s case, it takes a more sensual and aesthetic approach. The genre of biological painting matured in 17th-century Dutch painting, took on a Rococo decorative style in the 18th century, and then regained prominence in the 19th century with Realism and Impressionism . Renoir deeply admired the biological paintings of past masters such as Chardin and Delacroix , and inherited their method of assimilating everyday motifs to a high level of artistic quality . At the same time, however, he established a more modern and sensual approach to biological painting by applying Impressionist color theory. His works brilliantly combine Chardin’s sensibility of the everyday with Impressionist experiences of light and color. While the peach is often a symbol of femininity and the divine in French painting, Renoir lovingly depicts the peaches as a more familiar joy of life. The Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition, to be held in 2025, will showcase the two masters’ biological paintings side by side. The peach and Cézanne’s ripe apple, the sugared apple, and the large swathe of apples symbolize the differences in their artistic sensibilities. While Cézanne pursued scientific composition and spatial structure through his biological paintings, Renoir prioritized color over form and sensation over construction. For Cézanne, painting was something to be constructed, while for Renoir, it was something to be felt. This difference demonstrates the diversity of seeing in art and is crucial for understanding how modern art, beyond impressionism, began to embark on diverse paths. Peach is a key piece in this dialogue, demonstrating how Renoir’s art connected life and beauty. Peach speaks of a sense of entitlement and the joy of life through a single fruit. Its beauty lies not in any particular subject or technique, but rather in Renoir’s eye for finding beauty in the ordinary, everyday moments . The soft color of the peach, the clean brightness of the white vessel and tablecloth , and the rhythm of the background colors all harmonize to create a single painting that expresses joy within . When we view this work, we are touched by the heartfelt expression of life that Renoir entrusted to his paintings. Renoir’s work, Flowers Under Flowers, embodies the beauty and elegance of modern painting. Auguste Renoir’s paintings, from 1841 to 1919, are representative of Impressionism, and their vibrant, vibrant colors left a profound mark on artists of the late 19th century. Renoir’s paintings are characterized by the happy expressions of people, soft contours, and lush light, but his work extends beyond portraits and genre scenes. His artistic sensibility and inquisitiveness are also fully apparent in his works that feature living things, particularly flowers. The work we will be studying, Flowers in a Vase (1898), housed in the Musée de l’Orangerie, is a particularly captivating example of Renoir’s biological paintings. This work, which will be shown to Japanese audiences as part of the exhibition “Renoir and Cézanne: Two Masters Who Founded Modernity” (from the Musée de l’Orangerie d’Orsay collection) to be held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2013, is a valuable resource for understanding Renoir’s approach to modernism and his use of color and technique. Renoir , who was particularly known for his portraits of the human figure among the Renoir School, excelled in depicting everyday happiness and intimate spaces. He also repeatedly explored life, often choosing subjects rich in life, such as flowers and fruit. Life offered Renoir a platform for the exploration of pure color and movement, as well as a perfect experiment for the development of his technique. Painted at the end of the 19th century, Flowers in a Vase dates from Renoir’s mature period, when he was moving away from Impressionism and toward a more constructive and painterly style. During this period, he reevaluated the influence of older masters such as Rubens and Ingres, and began to place greater emphasis on form and symmetry in his paintings . Composition and Subject: As its name suggests, this work, Flowers Under Flowers, centers around flowers in a vase. A tall flower vase stands in the center , from which a variety of flowers radiate in a chaotic fashion. The colorful flowers, presumably roses , dahlias, marigolds, and geraniums, create a composition rich in chromatic harmony and movement. The details of the table on which the vase is placed and the background are relatively simple, drawing the eye naturally to the center of the flowers. Spatial depth is kept to a minimum, emphasizing the central focus of the work’s composition, which highlights Renoir’s keen observational skills and ability to accurately capture the vitality of objects. He viewed flowers not merely as static motifs, but as encompassing the living moment they embodied. The splendor of their blooming and the eventual process of their fading are both beautifully captured. Flowers in Vibrance and Light: One of Renoir’s greatest attractions is, without a doubt, his color. Even the flowers in the vase are covered in a riot of warm reds, pinks, yellows, whites, and greens. These colors are never solid, thickly applied. Renoir’s brushstrokes are short and soft, tracing each petal as if layering colors. His depiction of light is also striking. While there are no strong light sources, the flowers are bathed in a soft, diffused light, giving the entire painting a gentle glow. This is the result of Renoir’s unique technique of diffuse expression, avoiding fine shadows and creating the effect of confining the light within the color . Even more noteworthy is the chromatic contrast with the background. The background is deliberately composed in dull grays and beiges, highlighting the vividness of the flowers leaning forward. This color scheme compels the viewer to confront the flowers head -on. The retreat of two artists who opened the modern era: Renoir and Cézanne. The 2025 exhibition at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art, where Flowers in a Vase will be exhibited, is conscious of the retreat of Paul Cézanne. Both artists were active from the late 19th century to the early 20th century and are considered the fathers of modern art. However , their approaches differed greatly. While Cézanne approached his subjects scientifically, pursuing structural insanity and spatiality, Renoir emphasized sensation, emotion, and soft beauty. While Cézanne’s flowers in vases are sometimes heavy and sculptural, like stone, Renoir’s give the impression of airy fragrance. This difference stems from how the two artists perceived modern art. Cézanne saw painting as a construction , while Renoir saw it as a transference of sacred joy. By viewing their works side by side, viewers can experience the diversity of modern art and the broadening meaning of viewing. The joy of interference, flowers that speak to the viewer. In a sense, Flowers in a Vase is a work that is very open to the viewer. While it does not have a clear narrative like a portrait or history, the viewer is free to roam freely, exploring the colors, shapes, and textures. Flowers are a symbol of the ordinary in our everyday lives, a motif that evokes the joy and humility of life. Renoir’s paintings of flowers resonate across the canvas like music, quietly speaking to the viewer’s heart. The flowers, conveying their message that this moment is beautiful, have an enduring power that resonates across the ages . Flowers in the Cabin symbolizes the state of quiet perfection that Pierre-Auguste Renoir reached in his later years . Vibrant colors, soft brushstrokes, and gentle light, they encapsulate the sacred joy and pleasure of self-sufficiency that he consistently pursued. The 25th anniversary exhibition will showcase the rich expression of these biological paintings alongside works by Cézanne, providing a deeper understanding and new discoveries. Renoir’s Flowers in a Vase is not simply a painting of flowers; it is a quiet participation that evokes the triple gaze in our daily lives . A Moment of Soft Existence: Pierre -Auguste Renoir’s Biological Paintings of Apples and Pears: A painting must first please the eye. So said Pierre Auguste and Renoir. Renoir’s conviction in artistic ideals was evident not only in his vibrant portraits and luminous landscapes, but also in his seemingly modest biological paintings. Apples and Pears, painted around 1895 , is a representative example. While dealing with the traditional subject of fruit, in this painting he transcends mere fruit and evokes the presence of richly lived beings through the magic of color and texture . This work will be introduced as a parallel between the two masters who opened the exhibition Renoir x Sézanne Moda, to be held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in Marunouchi, Tokyo, in 2025. Both painters who brought conviction to French painting at the end of the 19th century also forged their own paths in the biological genre. With this subject in mind, we would like to shed light on Renoir’s unique market, which unfolds throughout Apples and Pears. Composition and Color Weave the Joy of Qualification: Let us first focus on the composition of this work. Several apples and pears are placed in a random arrangement on a white tablecloth. The fruits are clustered slightly to the left, and a deep brown container is placed on the right side of the background. This arrangement, with its clear center, exudes an improvisational quality, like a snapshot of a casual moment in everyday life, while bringing balance and rhythm to the entire painting . The fruit’s soft forms and deliberately vague outlines blend naturally into the flickering colors. The red of the apple blends with the pure, golden color of the pear, spreading a warm, breathing touch across the surface. The fruit is not painted as an object , but as a presence placed in light and air. The white cross is not a cold, drab background. Here, too, Renoir’s signature short, soft, rotating strokes are present, with the shadows and lines creating a soft topography . It could be said that it is both a fabric and the skin of the space that envelops the fruit. Paintings of Texture or the Light of Tentacles: Renoir’s biological paintings stand out from many other artists in their overwhelming tactile quality. These paintings are meant to be felt, not just seen. This is due to his desire for something resembling skin within his paintings. In these apples and pears, the fruit does not simply reflect and shine, but is painted as if the light itself is emanating from within. The colors are not merely superficial, but seem to emanate from within. For Renoir, color was not something that traced the outside of an object, but rather a manifestation of life emerging from within. Behind these depictions lies his relationship with Tatsumachi. By the time of this work, he was already suffering from pain in his fingers, and in his later years, he even tied a brush to his hand while writing. His desperation became more rounded and softer, perhaps as a result of assimilating these physical limitations into his paintings . The roundness of the fruit, the texture of the fabric, the warmth of the space— all of these things inspire the viewer’s tactile imagination, awakening their physical senses , and creating a place where antennae intersect. This is the essential appeal of Renoir’s biological paintings. An example of the difference between his work and Cézanne’s and the division of the senses. This exhibition intentionally juxtaposes Cézanne’s biological forms with Renoir’s. While they lived in the same era and interacted, their attitudes toward painting were completely different. In his biological paintings, Cézanne pursued a scientific structure and a rigorous grasp of space . The tilt of the fruit placement platform, the shadow-stretching technique, and other elements of the paintings. For him, fruit was an experimental device for examining the issue of appearance, an object for rationally reexamining the instability of the real world . In contrast, Renoir portrayed fruit as a subject for admiration, a delight for the eye and soul . In Apples and Pears, the apples and pears exist as objects present, placed within a swarm of color and light rather than the dynamics of the composition. This difference clearly reflects the different questions the two artists posed about the essence of art. While Cézanne constantly questioned how things looked, Renoir constantly questioned how things felt. This exchange between the two artists’ biological paintings will provide a rare opportunity to experience the watershed moment in modern painting. From a symbol of space to a symbol of pleasure, the depiction of fruit in biological paintings has taken on symbolic meanings, such as pleasure and pleasure, since the 17th-century Dutch period. However, Renoir intentionally deconstructs this symbolism, allowing us to fully appreciate the joy of seeing itself. The fruits in this painting transcend appetite and coincidence and exist on the canvas as beauty itself. They speak, yet breathe with color, shape, and edibility, gently satisfying the viewer’s senses. This decorative yet inward-looking style epitomizes the materialistic expression of quality in late 19th-century painting. Renoir’s fruits, simply placed there, soothe and enrich the viewer’s soul. They convey a sense of the painting’s presence, transcending emotion and logic. Therein lies the deepest aesthetic of his art. Paintings are vessels of happiness. The apples and pears quietly demonstrate this. The fruits depicted in these paintings will never be eaten. Yet they offer viewers quiet comfort and tranquility. For Renoir, this was the role of art. Facing this work, we are reminded of the beauty that resides in the small, everyday moments. The roundness of the fruit, the smearing of the colors, and the texture of the fabric all sing of a reality that we often overlook. Apples and Pears is a song of richness that can only be heard by those who engage their eyes and hearts in the quiet of a museum. Colors have no voice, yet they undoubtedly express Renoir’s love of seeing. Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Strawberries, a life painting from his later years and housed at the Musée de l’Orangerie around 1905, exudes a particularly serene and intimate atmosphere among his fruit-themed works. This work will also be one of the key exhibits that will serve as the focal point of the contrasting aesthetics of these two masters in the exhibition Renoir x Cézanne Modern , to be held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. Renoir, who began his career as an Impressionist, produced numerous life paintings in addition to portraits and landscapes from the late 19th century to the early 20th century . In particular, in 2000, despite the physical limitations of his work , he continued to paint familiar subjects—fruit, noses, and rags—with unwavering passion . This work is firmly within that tradition, exuding a sense of concentration, as if all attention and thought is poured into a limited motif . The composition is extremely original. A mountain of red fruit is piled high on a plate from the period. The background features a soft cloth and table, with the edge of the bowl glimpsed on the right edge of the canvas. Yet, this limited information contains a surprising amount of richness and diversity . Each individual berry is imbued with a vibrant red and aura that draws the viewer’s attention. Renoir’s distinctive brushstrokes, which blend the contours, and the subtle red accents make the fruit seem more than just food, but life itself. The contrast with the background is also impressive, with the rich red of the fruit blending seamlessly with the sudden cloth and the soft white of the period, without clashing. Within this harmony, a sense of sobriety and the joy of color coexist . This work simultaneously combines aesthetic pleasure, contemplation, and compassion for its subject, truly concentrating Renoir’s aesthetic world. Throughout his life, Renoir maintained that painting should be enjoyable. True to his words, No. 1 and No. 2 are filled with a gentle power that leads the viewer to happiness. The motif of fruit has taken on many meanings, including art teacher, pleasure, contemplation, flowers, and the richness of nature. The strawberry, in particular, can be symbolically interpreted as a young girl’s lips or cheeks or the lingering splendor of love, due to its color and shape . However, Renoir does not exaggerate such randomness; rather, he seems to unconsciously or consciously eliminate it, concentrating solely on the pure joy of looking. This can be seen as an approach that incorporates the influence of 18th-century French painters such as Rubens and Boucher while also pioneering a new modern sensationalism. For Renoir, the act of painting itself was the only way to find freedom within his restricted body. He famously wrote with his brushes tied to his hands with bandages, as his belief in reason prevented him from having any freedom of thought . However, the strawberry conveys no hint of such difficulties; rather, it conveys sexual pleasure itself . The colors seem to seep onto the canvas directly from his palms and heart, not from F. For Renoir, color is not just a qualifying element. It is a tactile experience, a source of emotion. The various layers of red in the painting, which were the touch of love, are like the skin of the painting. The viewer can caress and taste the painting through their gaze. There is no coldness or hardness in the painting; everything is soft, intimate, and warm. This sensuous approach to color influenced contemporary painters such as Mas, who became a pioneer of hobbies, and Bonnard, who painted intimate interior spaces . However, Renoir’s colors are more emotional than their counterparts, and their strength lies in their maturation through intuitive completion rather than construction. Red, as red, and white, as white, begin to breathe aerobically in his hands. It is also noteworthy that in the 1925 exhibition, this work will be exhibited alongside Paul Cézanne’s life paintings. For Cézanne, fruit was a tool for elucidating the structure of matter, a structural unit of weight that dominates the painting . His fruit is cold, motionless, and illusory. Renoir’s strawberries, by contrast, are a warm, soft, tangible fountain of sensation. Displaying these two life paintings together is extremely useful in clarifying the divergence between sensation and construction in the transition from Impressionism to Modernism. For artists, fruit is not merely an object, but a mirror that reflects their thoughts and emotions. Cézanne wrote about structure, while Renoir wrote about love. Each fruit expresses a different view of life, art, and the world. Renoir’s “Strawberry,” the Inn of Fruit, embodies within its small canvas the fundamental joy of painting. It is an eye for color, a trust in the tactile experience of quality, and, above all, a confidence in the everyday. The viewer loses track of time in front of this work, immersed in its gaze, and even feels the illusion of catching the scent of the fruit . Touched by the quietly rising ripples of red, Renoir held on to this work even into his later years, we are enveloped in the joy of seeing. He entrusted the fruit with the purest happiness painting can offer—not righteous deeds or ideas, but simply momentary beauty itself . And this is why Renoir deserves a reevaluation today as a modernist. Renoir’s art was also a place to recapture the sensory pleasures often lost in the turbulent waves of modernization . When we encounter his work, we see how art can bring about quiet miracles in the everyday. It is never a dramatic drama; rather, it is a world tenderly presented, open to all. Demand for Renoir in Japan was widespread through postwar art education and print culture, and his approachable style, particularly through the mail, has remained highly popular throughout the ages. The exhibition of Go in this volume will likely provide many visitors with an opportunity to rediscover Renoir’s true essence. Finally, I would like to reiterate the quality of happiness embodied in this work. For Renoir, happiness was not the absence of suffering, but rather the power to find joy amid pain and limitations. The red in the background is not simply the color of fruit, but the passion for life-affirming artistic expression. Renoir demonstrates, without utterance, simply by writing, that painting is a means of cultivating human dignity. Flowers as a Place of Color: Market and Form in Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Life Paintings of the Ages. Pierre- Auguste Renoir (1841-1919 ) is widely known as a master of Impressionism and holds an extremely important place in late 19th-century French painting . His worlds, filled with light and color, convey a soft , aesthetic quality that never fails to convey emotional pleasure and a warm, human sense of purity to the viewer . While Renoir is renowned for his portraits of women and children and his soft, naturalistic landscapes , he also established a unique style in the genre of life painting. For Renoir, painting flowers was not simply a reproduction of living creatures; it was an artistic act that allowed him to touch the essence of life through color. Flowers were a deeply natural and intimate motif for him, and their beauty and delicacy allowed him to explore the shifts in light and color, the fragility of nature, and the fluidity of the senses. The composition in “Just ” depicts a variety of flowers, including red, pink, wood, and purple , densely packed into a medium-sized, contemporary vase. The ability to identify specific varieties is a powerful force, and the collective phenomenon of the flowers as a whole dominates the painting. Renoir strives to capture the tactile impression that emerges from their appearance rather than precisely depicting the subject . These flowers celebrate the texture and warmth that evoke not only the senses but also the sense of smell and antennae. This is precisely the confidence in the sensory painting that Renoir pursued throughout his life, inviting objects into the rhythm and softness of their colors. Renoir ‘s memories of his pottery days and painter career, as well as his experience as an apprentice painter in his youth, are clearly reflected in his later biological paintings. In “Flowers,” the depiction of the vase supporting the flowers is not simply a vessel, but is constructed as a presence that provides stability and a sculptural center of gravity for the painting . The vase softly reflects the luster of herbs, and the subtle fluctuations of color on its surface are meticulously reproduced through the application of paint. The roundness and weight of the vase are gently depicted, further accentuating the lightness of the flowers . The ratio of vase to flower—that is, the vessel and the living body—is a traditional structure in biological painting , but Renoir assimilates this pattern into a sensuous resonance. The coldness and hardness of the vase resonates with the softness and warmth of the flowers, bringing a natural harmony to the painting . The greatest appeal of flowers lies above all in the way they are handled and painted. Renoir constructs his subjects with soft touches—laying, stroking, and layering—rather than simply applying paint . The colors blend with each other, with barely any clear outlines. While these brushstrokes are an extension of Impressionist techniques , they also evolved into Renoir’s own unique style in his later years . In particular, the depictions of flowers skillfully intertwine multiple layers of color, from red to orange, pink, white, and even a hint of blue-purple in the center of the flower, creating a rich sensory experience for the viewer. The paint layers are thin and sometimes hot, and their uneven surfaces reflect the light beautifully, making the still painting appear as if it were a living, flowing mess. For Renoir, this use of color and texture was a way to capture the transformations of light while also evoking the subject’s inherent rhythm. The most prominent flower occupies the canvas as if playing a chromatic chorus as a whole rather than as an individual entity . Renoir’s biological paintings are characterized by a natural flow of flowers rather than a strict composition . Even in the flowers , there is no clear center line or symmetry. However, subtle touches are incorporated throughout to guide the eye. For example, the most vibrant red flower is placed subtly in the upper left corner of the canvas, its sides highlighted by the pale pink and white surrounding it. The lower part of the bottle is subtly shaded, dominating the white space at the bottom of the canvas, giving the painting a sense of stability. In this way, Renoir reconstructs a complex assemblage of colors into a pleasing order through delicate color balance and precise rhythm . This is an aesthetic of composition based on the senses, a departure from Cézanne’s construction, which pursued scientific order. While Renoir’s creatures have often been discussed as being character-less, this is merely a misconception that underestimates his decorative side. In fact, his creatures had a profound influence on Matisse and other Fauvists, as well as on painters like Bonnard and Buillard . Their shared color-driven compositions, soft continuity, and sensual fluctuations in composition are reflected in Renoir’s later flower-like works, which could be said to bridge the gap between creatures. The richness of color in these works transcends reality, suggesting new possibilities for 20th-century painting through their subtle color rhythms . Renoir was an artist who believed in and pursued beauty and the joy of the senses throughout his life. Around 1901, when he painted Flowers, he was already suffering from chronic illness, but it is well known that he continued to paint with bandages on his hands or with bandages attached to his fingers . It is surprising that such a bright and expressive work was produced in such a difficult physical condition. The soft, vibrant colors that permeate the canvas truly symbolize the essence of Renoir’s art. Flowers are a vital part of his work, creating a sense of pleasure through color while also offering a quiet blessing to the viewer. The flowers wither, the painting fades, and time passes . However, the vibrant colors within the canvas remain warmly etched in the viewer’s memory. Renoir ‘s brushwork has transformed the canvas into something eternal. And when this flower is presented alongside Cézanne’s sensual and tense biological paintings in a 2025 exhibition, it will surely reinforce Renoir’s artistic significance as a modernist, grounded in the senses. Through color and texture, this flower blooming within a biological painting speaks to us of the joy of living and the happiness of experiencing beauty. Renoir’s work, ” Chaotic Life Residing in a Perpetual Creature ,” features Pierre-Auguste Renoir, known as one of the Impressionist masters, who continually explored the effects of light and color in his portraits and landscapes . While his name is often associated with sun-kissed skin, the graceful postures of women, and outdoor scenes filled with a quaint atmosphere, living things, especially flowers, played a crucial role in his later work. This paper focuses on “Tulips 2: Shop,” created around 1905, and examines in detail the form and color that informed his painting, as well as the artistic strategies behind it . Flowers are the work of vitality and passion in a battle scene. What first catches the eye in “Tulips” is the presence of the tulips, with their vibrant hues of red, wood, and pink, filling the canvas . These flowers are not merely decorative motifs; Renoir’s effusions celebrate the intense vitality of each, as if they were beating. In his later years, Renoir is said to have told his religious devotee, Galard, that painting flowers is like Delacroix’s battle scenes. At first glance, his words seem palpable, but standing before the tulips, one realizes that they are not simply skin, but the very essence of his intensely felt emotions. Within the canvas, the flowers collide with one another , never pausing for a moment in the fluid composition that unfolds from front to back, enacting the intensity of their poignancy. Flowers have long been a symbol of the darkness and emptiness of life in Western art, but Renoir’s tulips are by no means a quiet, decorative death. Rather, they represent the moment of change, the tranquility and chaos of the sacred, disrupted by the materiality of paint. Renoir’s conviction in living creatures emerges as the dominant presence. Renoir began to seriously engage with biological painting around 1900, when his chronic illness made it difficult for him to freely go out and sketch people, and he began to focus on studio work . Thus, his lifelong biological paintings, which could be considered the culmination of his painting career, condense his awareness of elements, color, composition, and balance. The controlled arrangement of the flowers in Tulips is also noteworthy. The vase, firmly planted in the center of the canvas, supports the canvas with a calm, consistent presence and a smooth center, evoking the idea of the chaotic colors . Renoir’s experience as a period painter is clearly evident in the way he expresses this texture. The shadows of the flower moth are inscribed with subtle overlapping colors and soft reflections of light, maintaining the overall harmony of the painting . In this way, Renoir successfully anchors the main flow of the flower’s colors within the painting through material support . His creatures differ from the traditional motif of a sedimented organism, as they are created through meticulous calculation of the movement of color and the balance of both senses . In a departure from the music of color and Cézanne, this work, “Tulips,” will be exhibited alongside Cézanne’s “Blue Flower Moth ” in the exhibition “Renoir x Cézanne Modern,” to be held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. The aim of this exhibition is to highlight the distinctive characteristics of each artist’s painting by juxtaposing their biological paintings, which share different artistic philosophies . While Cézanne emphasized strict composition and scientific structure, Renoir pursued the pleasure of light, the tactile sensation, and the intensity of color as if enveloped in light . The colors of the tulips are no longer a reproduction of nature, but rather a kind of musical music, a culmination of sensation and emotion. Precise contours are abandoned, and the soft, natural nuances of every shape create a free-flowing rhythm throughout the painting. Renoir’s use of color is by no means accidental. In his letters and conversations from his final years, he repeatedly spoke of his intention to combine light and color like music. The chromatic harmony that resonates from the tulip paintings is the very essence of his philosophy, possessing a captivating power that unifies the senses . Physicality and the pleasure of light are the pinnacle of Renoir’s art. Renoir’s depictions of living creatures convey a similar sensation to the view of the human body. His brushstrokes render each petal as if it were skin. The paints’ feel, like tracing skin rather than cloth, is backed by the pursuit of such aesthetic pleasure. This is not mere decorativeism. For Renoir, flowers were a tangible reality, a reality that emerged completely through the materiality of paint. His flower paintings represent the purest embodiment of this concept. Especially in paintings saturated with color like tulips, the viewer’s gaze has no specific focus; rather, they are guided to rotate the entire canvas. This experience of beauty is not a static image, but a movement within the canvas . This creates a dynamism that even involves the grateful body. This is precisely the tactile painting Renoir aimed for, and it harbors the power to blur the line between painting and the body . Finally, the colors of the soul resonate with the flower. What Renoir achieved with tulips was not simply to depict the beauty of flowers. It was an attempt to portray the life itself, existing in color through the flower, and a resonance of the painting’s own soul . In his final years, Renoir continued to hold his brush, painting flowers with his hands clenched in the brush. Despite the pain, and even in the midst of it, he drew inspiration from color through the medium of the brush. Looking at the tulips with this background in mind, it becomes clear that these proud flowers are not merely a product of nature, but the culmination of Renoir’s belief in the sainthood of the emperor and beauty. What is depicted there is not just a flower, but Renoir the painter himself. In a way that differs from Cézanne’s characteristic construction, this work offers the viewer another dimension of the art of painting . That is, Renoir’s unique philosophy of expression: constructing paintings by sensation rather than structure, by touch rather than idea, by life rather than concept . The tulips are the culmination of this philosophy, a chromatic exercise and one of the most dazzling fruits of the biological genre. A Sign of Absence: Death Offstage, Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Spoonful of Miracle Flowers, painted around 1880, is one of the few works in his career to feature theatrical space. The painting features neither a stage nor actors; instead, a bouquet of flowers quietly rests in the auditorium, beside a red armchair. This work was a deeply personal venture for Renoir, temporarily setting aside his preoccupations with light, color, and human figures to explore the sense of space and absence—the traces of human presence. This work is unique in that it is captured not from the theater’s spatial context but from the audience’s seating. Yet, there are no people in sight. The main focus of the painting is the bright red armchair, the dazzling flowers on it, and the faintly visible light gray banister. Focusing on such an empty space is actually an endeavor requiring extremely sensitive observation and sensitivity. Theater scenes typically involve theatrical sets, gorgeous costumes, or scenes filled with the passion of actors and audiences . However, Renoir found B in the moment of silence after the sword fight had passed or before the performance began . It was as if they were waiting for something, or something The painting evokes a sense of the aftereffect of the moment. The red chair still retains its warmth, and the bouquet quietly awaits its owner. There is no human figure depicted, yet its presence is all the more powerful. This is perhaps a manifestation of Renoir’s personal style, enclosing presence and memory through qualified silence. The focus of the painting is on the bouquet of roses resting on the armchair. The colors range from red to pale pink, rendered with delicate gradations, and the overlapping petals are imbued with Renoir’s signature soft brushstrokes. It is a depiction that celebrates the spectacle of the image, evoking the texture of women’s skin and dresses, a quality he has long portrayed . However, this bouquet is no mere living thing. It is painted as a representative of an invisible figure, the seated owner. Roses are often considered a symbol of femininity and spectacle, but in this case, the bouquet speaks for the very presence of the elegant woman who owns it. In other words, this work evokes the memory and presence of a woman through her absence . Considering that the roses are thrown onto the stage, it’s possible that the bouquet was a memento of the final act or a gift from someone . If so, this work functions as a kind of narrative device, stimulating the imagination. Who the bouquet belongs to, where she is, why she left it , all are left unexplained, but a small story begins to emerge from the grateful beast. What is distinctive about this work is its bold yet restrained color composition. The red chair, which dominates the canvas, is close to Renoir’s favorite cadmium colors. Rather than being monotonous, the shades add depth and dimension. The curved back and arms of the chair are outlined in black, emphasizing its decorativeness while ensuring the painting’s structural stability. Meanwhile, the gray background and the pale treatment of the handrail retain an impressionist approach that captures the subtle changes in light. As a result, the entire canvas transcends mere biological matter and celebrates a decorative world in which colors and shapes blend together like music. In this way, Spoonfuls is a work in which multiple elements—criticism and slander, both with composition, and living creatures and narrative—coexist in exquisite balance. It can be seen as a culmination of Renoir’s search for a unified decorative and sensual expression in the midst of his career. Around 1880, when Renoir wrote this work, Paris was the center of vibrant urban culture. Theaters such as the Opera and the Theatre de Paris were social gatherings, spaces where audiences, more than just watching the performance, could acknowledge each other’s presence. Spoonfuls, in particular, were a venue where women of the aristocracy and upper bourgeoisie could display their beauty and fashion . Renoir was also a painter deeply immersed in this theatrical culture . The decorative elements of lace, silk, and feathers that frequently appear in his figure paintings were closely linked to theatrical culture of the time. The bouquet of roses in this work also carries highly symbolic significance as a vestige of women’s presence in the social space of the theater. In other words, the theater was not a space for viewing a performance, but a space for performing oneself. When we view this work from this perspective, we can reach a deeper layer of social meaning . The two masters who opened this exhibition, Renoir x Cézanne Modern, are also attempts to demonstrate the two different paths that art took after the impression. While Cézanne emphasized the logic of space and mobility and attempted to reconstruct the visible world, Renoir emphasized the joy of seeing and the oil of the senses. The spatial management, color composition, and descriptive approach of depicting absence in “Spoon Miracle Bouquet” contrast with Cézanne’s architectural constructivity. Cézanne would have clearly grasped the structure of the bouquet and the perspective of the seat and arranged them scientifically. However , Renoir deliberately blurred the perspective and avoided directing the eye to a specific focal point, pursuing a sense of floating in space and the beauty of white space. This comparison provides an important resource for understanding how French art after the impression developed along two axes: painting of the senses and painting of construction. Renoir’s “Miraculous Bouquet” should be positioned as a symbolic work on the axis of this sensation. “Miraculous Bouquet” is a quietly ambitious work that demonstrates Renoir’s interest in not merely Impressionist painting but also in spatial and memory layers. It speaks of the presence of people without depicting them. It conveys theatrical drama without depicting a setting. The bouquet, as a proxy for all of this, speaks a rich voice within the painting. In today’s world, we are often bombarded with information about qualifications, but perhaps the silence or absence of qualifications that Renoir demonstrates in this work is something we should reclaim . Here lies the fundamental transcendence of seeing and the original spirit of art woven by the imagination . The question of what story the viewer will impart to the quiet words of this bouquet is the true dialogue in painting. The Shape of Flowers: The Interaction of Life. Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Works: Roses. Pierre-Auguste Renoir was known as a master of Impressionism, but his work was far more than just that. Throughout his career , Renoir continued to pursue the goal of assimilating the essence of beauty inherent in his subjects and the radiance of life in both humans and nature. Renoir’s biological paintings around 1890 are particularly noteworthy for their fusion of a deeper pictorial structure and a more complete aesthetic, while retaining the bright aesthetic of Impressionism . The painting on display at the Museum of Fine Arts, “Rose-Horsey,” dates from this period and showcases the endless transformations of the floral motif within its natural and intense colors . This work will likely play an important role in the exhibition “Renoir x Cézanne Modern, ” held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 1925, as it explores the interplay between the gazes of the two masters, Renoir and Cézanne. This article will explore in detail the issues of form and language expressed by this rose, its philosophy, and its place in Renoir’s overall work . Flowers have long been symbolic and decorative in the art world . They are a multilayered motif, symbolizing loveliness, femininity, and even religious beliefs . Renoir’s choice of subject matter was not merely a depiction of a living creature, but a manifestation of his aesthetic ideals. Around 1890 was a time of great interest for Renoir. He was already developing an Impressionist style, exploring more structural detail, smoother surface treatments, and a revival of classical aesthetics. His depictions of roses were not simply an attempt to capture the beauty of flowers ; they were a search for a new way to integrate human aesthetic sensibility with the inheritance of nature . What first catches the viewer’s eye in a rose painting is the rich hues of the petals and the soft expanse they create across the painting. The rose in the center is vividly layered with red, pink, and white dots, seemingly frozen in time at the moment of bloom . The colors are not merely a reproduction of color; they also seem to breathe life into the painting, incorporating the flow of light and air. The background is deliberately simplified , featuring soft browns and neutral tones. This further accentuates the chromatic vibrations of the nose. This treatment inherits the Impressionist technique of blurring the background to highlight the subject, while at the same time showing Renoir’s constructivist thinking. The painting departs somewhat from the Impressionist style, with a smoother and more precise treatment. Each petal has a texture that seems to be from the time of the painting, and exudes a softness that seems to reflect the light. Renoir’s conviction in the painting , even in his later years, can be seen in the way that the presence of the petals is felt, but functions as part of the structure that supports the appeal of the motif without asserting itself. For Renoir, color was not merely a surface, but an internal rhythm emanating from the subject, and had the power to directly appeal to the completion of the subject. The gradation of the rose petals is as soft as human skin, and the colors appear to blend together depending on the lighting. This shows that the same sensibility that Renoir used when painting female figures is also applied to living creatures. The flowers he paints are not merely botanical records, but living beings. Flowers eventually wither and fade, but it is in their fleeting moments that they radiate eternal brilliance. Renoir sought to capture this ephemeral beauty in order to ventilate the viewer’s sensory pleasure. In particular, this rose achieves an extremely high level of purified sensory pleasure . The harmony of the complete composition, the richness of the colors, the smoothness of the material, and the restraint of necessity demonstrates the state of mind that Renoir reached . Renoir’s flower paintings are often compared to portraits. The overlapping and rounded petals of the rose, in particular, evoke a softness and sensuality reminiscent of the female body, functioning as a means of ventilating memories and sensations. In other words, the rose is a living being, yet the figure embraces its physicality, a contrast that embodies Renoir’s distinctively inverted composition. The exhibition “Renoir x Cézanne Modern,” held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025, showcases the works of two seemingly opposing artists, reevaluating their contributions to the period of artistic transformation from the late 19th century to the early 20th century . Within this context, the significance of “Rose” is particularly significant. While Cézanne’s apples and wild plants explored the power of form, the relationship between color, and space, Renoir ‘s roses represent a more sensory, contemplative approach. While both are living beings, their approaches to their subjects are entirely different. While Cézanne’s myrtle is about construction , Renoir’s is about feeling. This comparison resonates throughout the exhibition , and the rose, as its symbolic work , poses questions to the viewer: what is it, what does it mean to see, what does it mean to feel? Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s “Rose” condenses the essence of his artistic philosophy into a small canvas . Behind the splendor, the sharpness of the nose and the absolute moment of sensation are contained, which is why they so touch the viewer’s heart. While Cézanne sought to capture nature through a long-range perspective, Renoir sought to capture the softness, warmth, and tenderness found in nature. Both approaches have become essential elements of 20th-century art and have had a profound influence on modern art ever since . This piece not only represents Renoir’s culmination , but also serves as a device to reawaken the challenge of sensory expression in art for us modern people . The significance of this work’s re-exposure in Japan goes beyond simply displaying a historical artifact ; it will serve as a valuable opportunity to reexamine the origins of beauty and righteousness. The Woman with a Hat, the culmination of Renoir’s long-standing artistic endeavors and the ultimate representation of the female figure, is a must-see, shining even brighter than before. Pierre- Auguste Renoir’s Woman with a Hat, painted in his final years, is a masterful blend of a profound aesthetic style that could be said to be the pinnacle of his artistic achievements and the drive to create that remained strong even in his later years . This work dates from the period of his trial, when Renoir’s hands were disfigured by the police and he was forced to paint with F tied to his hands. Yet the hitch is surprisingly lively, full of a youthful energy, as if recapturing it . Though the model’s name is unknown, it’s likely she was one of the young women frequenting Renoir’s studio at the time. This work transcends the portrait of a specific individual and should be seen as an attempt to infuse the beauty of the feminine into the entire canvas . The face, clothing, hat, and background all harmonize to emerge as a single, beautiful entity . The hat motif, the intersection of man and nature, is undoubtedly the painting’s most striking focal point . The large, billowing hat is adorned with rich fabric, feathers, and flowers, and its complex textures and colors are layered throughout. It was a symbol of women’s fashion from the late 19th century to the early 20th century, a symbol of social status and fashion, while also being an extremely appealing figurative motif for artists. Renoir accurately captures the subtle details of the hat, such as the softness of the fabric, the texture of the feathers shimmering in the light, and the false petals, but he doesn’t limit himself to realism , instead anchoring them in the painting as a sensual, mainstream experience. The hat is not merely a part of the garment; it is a mirror that reflects the model’s inner self and personality, and it also serves as a focal point for Renoir ‘s own desire for color and his personal style. The Death of Light: The Relationship Between Background and Desire A common characteristic of Renoir’s works is his masterful use of the background. In Woman with a Hat, the background is not densely filled in, but rather softly blurred, composed of subtle gradations of color. This ambiguity of the background highlights the specific motifs of the woman’s face, hat, and dress, while also creating a rich sense of spaciousness and soft atmosphere. Particularly noteworthy is Renoir’s color adventure in depicting the face. Through complex layers of pink, salmon, ochre, and lavender, the skin texture appears almost breathable. Where the shadow of the hat falls on her cheeks, soft gray and blue tones intersect, creating a personal light that transcends the art of tea . The depiction of the eyes and mouth is detailed yet never rigid; rather, it is processed to blend into the overall impression. Renoir’s intent to portray the presence of a person rather than the shape of the face itself is apparent here. Universality and anonymity as a portrait . While this work is a portrait, it is significant that it does not rely on the electrical information of a specific person . This is because it transcends portraiture, presenting an ideal image of a woman, or even a feminine image as art. The observer does not need to know who this woman is. Indeed, it is precisely because of this anonymity that viewers can overlay their own memories and emotions onto the painting and freely expand their imagination. For Renoir, women have always symbolized beauty and vitality. Especially in his later years, his brushwork gradually shifted away from individual characteristics and instead pursued idealized female figures. Woman with a Hat is another pinnacle of his domesticity, a work that transcends the individuality of the model and empowers universal femininity. A miracle for an aging artist overcoming illness. When discussing this painting, it is important to remember that Renoir ‘s body was already in extreme condition when he created it. His fingers were deformed by sexual arthritis, making it difficult for him to even sit in front of the canvas . In F, his hands were bandaged and he had to approach Gauff with the help of an assistant. Despite this, there is no hint of pain in this work . Rather, there is tenderness, brightness, and warmth. This brightness could be described as a spiritual light that overcame both, and it strongly suggests that for Renoir, painting was life itself. In fact, Renoir never stopped standing in front of Gauff, even in his later years . For Renoir, painting was more than a means of self-expression; it was a symbol of holiness, directly connected to the concept of the body. The soft brushstrokes of The Woman with the Hat, the warmth of the ceremonial stencil, and the supple presence of the woman emerging from it are all nothing less than participation in life. Decorative and structural: Renoir and Cézanne’s retreat. This work plays a significant role in the Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition, to be held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. While Cézanne established the foundations of modern painting through structural exploration, Renoir focused on sensibility and decorativeness, exploring the limits of human expression. While both artists opened the door to modern painting, their methods and thinking were completely different. The Woman with the Hat clearly demonstrates how decorative Renoir’s art was. However, this is not decorative in the superficial sense. Decoration is the creation of sensory pleasure using color and portable space, and is itself both meaning and structure. This unique connection between decoration and structure is what makes Renoir’s art unique, and his oil paintings pioneered the modern era in a way that differs from Cezanne’s. The legacy of a sense of eternity seen in Woman with a Hat. Finally, I would like to emphasize that what is depicted in Woman with a Hat is not just a moment in the past, but the shape of an eternal reality. The woman in the painting is not bound to a specific time or place. Her predictable, expressive nature is Its presence has a universality that speaks to the hearts of those who have been involved in every era. Through this work, Renoir offers his own answer to the questions: What is beauty? What does it mean to paint a woman? It is not a figure or a symbol, but a body discovered and constructed through perfection. And that body continues to captivate people, transcending time and the changing times. “Blonde Young Woman Pointing to a Rose” (Renoir’s “Eternal Light and Life”), a painting of an eternal female figure, is a masterpiece that demonstrates that Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s artistic intent, painted in the final stages of his disability, remained undiminished even in his later years, and in fact, had even grown stronger . At the time of writing this work, Renoir ‘s body was ravaged by joint dislocation, and the fingers on both hands were deformed, making it difficult for him to even write the letter F. Despite these physical challenges, his brush unleashed the same, if not even more, passionate and intuitive colors and lines on the canvas . This work depicts the young André-Madre Nuschling. She later became a film actress under the name Catherine Hessling and married Renoir’s second son, the film director Jean Renoir. This work, therefore, is a striking yet universal portrait of the woman who would become Renoir’s final muse and a member of his family. Life resides in softness and radiance. A young, rough-shouldered blonde woman stands slightly hunched over the canvas. A sea of soft pink roses is subtly smeared on the paper, their perfect hue seemingly complementing the firmness of the woman’s cheeks. The background is blurred, and the depiction, soft and seemingly luminous, gives the impression that the woman is floating in infinity. Renoir’s preference for this style of painting likely stems from his desire to no longer paint figures with precise accuracy but to condense the essence of existence—light, beauty, and life—into the canvas. Here, the body is reconstructed not as a mere physical entity but as a mass of sensation, melting into radiance. Skin tones vary with astonishing delicacy, and the overlapping colors even convey a sense of temperature. One cannot help but be moved by the fact that the artist’s hands, forcing their fingers to grasp the F, were able to create such a lifelike presence . The fusion of flowers and feminine motifs. Renoir often adorned female figures with flowers. This was not merely decorative; it was a deliberate fusion of motifs connected to his belief in aesthetic style. Since the 1900s, he has favored roses, especially in their prostration. While the rose has long been used as a symbol of femininity , Renoir portrays them as more than just a coincidence, portraying them as an inseparable part of the woman herself . In this work, the roses sewn into the paper are decorative yet clearly central, seemingly quietly speaking to the woman’s inner thoughts. The flower’s texture, nuances of color, and the receding and harmonizing with the woman’s skin create a harmonious musical composition within the painting . There is no church between the woman and the flowers. Renoir’s work reconciles the two, contrasting the intimate relationship between nature and humans. The mysteries and digestion of the perennial ideal of Mikalism . A tendency toward classical idealism can be seen in Renoir’s later works . As a central figure in the Impressionist movement, Renoir devoted himself to capturing the changing dynamics of the world and the impressions of the moment. However, by the 1900s, he began to consider a more refined style. This was influenced by the Renaissance artists he encountered abroad, such as Raphael and Titian, during his travels to Italy . This same classical Venus and tranquil composition can also be seen in the paintings. Elements such as the woman’s posture, gaze, blurred background, and subdued colors are expertly balanced, creating a sense of Renaissance stability. However, this is not simply a classical imitation of style ; it is the combination of Impressionist light theory and modern color sensibility that establishes Renoir’s unique aesthetic. The portrait takes on a deeper meaning when we learn about the personal background of the model, Andrée Schling, the artist’s new figure seen behind the portrait. She was more than just a model; she was an important figure in Renoir’s life and a source of artistic inspiration. Her allure may not simply be physical beauty, but also the very ideal Renoir held for women . In the work, she is portrayed as a being seemingly detached from the flow of time. Her solemnity seems to be imbued with Renoir’s own views of life and art. Even as his illness and illness worsened, Renoir persevered in his pursuit of beauty. This work is a prayer-like ode to his faith. The intersection of end and beginning: from Renoir to Jean Renoir. What is fascinating is that this model later became associated with Jean Renoir , connecting him to the history of art through the new medium of film. Andreus, also known as Catherine Hessling, appeared in many of Jean Renoir’s early films and created a unique presence in silent films. If this silent portrait marks the beginning of this artistic chain, then this work could be seen as both an end and a new artistic direction . This inheritance, in which the future of the sexual art of film is found within the sexual medium of sex, truly symbolizes the miracle of 20th-century art. It also demonstrates that Renoir, the painter, was not merely a master of Impressionism but occupied an important position in the larger context of the times. Significance at the Mitsubishi Ichigokan Museum of Art in 2025. The exhibition of this work at the Mitsubishi Ichigokan Museum of Art in 2025, featuring two masters, Renoir and Cézanne Modern, is significant. This exhibition contrasts Renoir and Cézanne, who were contemporaries but chose completely different artistic languages . Among these works, the blonde young woman pointing at the rose clearly demonstrates that Renoir’s art remained deeply rooted in human sensibility until the very end. While Cézanne established the foundations of modern painting through structure and intellect, Renoir explored the human dimension of art through emotion and joy. This work can be said to be the ultimate fruit of that tradition. The end of an era and the eternity of humanity coexist here, quietly speaking to us of the legal legacy of Renoir’s art. Light of the Body, Shadow of the Spirit: Pierre-Auguste and Renoir’s Question of Parenthood and Existence in Their Later Years, Seen in the Woman Who Loves Her. Painted between 1900 and 1914, Renoir’s Woman Striking a Woman celebrates tender intimacy and overwhelming fleshiness, revealing the artist’s pinnacle of artistic expression . This work belongs to the Musée de l’Orangerie collection and will be exhibited as one of the notable works at the Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. In this sense, it will be reevaluated as a confirmation of Renoir’s enduring work, transcending the boundaries of mere female portraiture and connecting to 20th-century art . The composition of Woman Striking a Woman is perfectly complete. The model sits in the center of the canvas, slightly bowed, her hand on her cheek, a tentative expression on her face . The background lacks clear depth or stage setting , and the space is filled with vague overlapping colors and soft gradations. Within this, the woman’s cheeks, arms, and fingertips—parts of her body—emerge, fermenting like fruit bathed in sunlight . This difference in the dynamics of space and the retreat from the basic expression of the body are the greatest characteristics of Renoir’s work. He no longer emphasizes the contours of objects, but blurs them and brings out the texture of the skin and the softness of the flesh, giving the whole picture an impression of a faint connection between a warrior and a villain . Here, the figure is depicted as a mass of light rather than a person. In this respect, The Woman Who Loves a Woman deviates from the genre of portraiture. It is not clear who the model is, and it could be one of the artist’s Tumarine or Oba Gabriel, or one of the women who were his long-time models, but there is no conclusive evidence. However, This is perhaps a thread in Renoir’s work. This work’s theme is not so much the artist’s, but the presence of the object depicted. Even in his final years, Renoir continued to explore the limits of physical expression, even during the excruciating pain of his own illness. In “Woman in Love,” he meticulously captures the texture of the model’s flesh—the softness of her cheeks, the thickness of her arms, and the fullness of her shoulders . This sense of realism is distinct from naturalistic depictions . This thoroughness in depicting the body is not unrelated to Renoir’s embrace of a new classicism that transcended ancient sculpture and the Renaissance. From the late 19th century to the early 20th century, Renoir traveled to Italy and became captivated by the works of classical masters such as Raphael and Rubens. Renoir once said that the true purpose of painting is to depict beautiful bodies, and his work is rooted in his belief that the human body is the foundation that supports painting across time and culture. As a result, the image of the woman swaying is not merely a depiction of interference or mood, but is endowed with a more enduring beauty of existence. Her pose, with her hand on her cheek, conveys not so much the image of a woman experimenting as the image of a living being immersed in a moment of reality. The wordless gratitude present in the painting leaves one unable to stop staring at the canvas. Renoir’s later paintings evolved from the light, ethereal touch of the Impressionist period to smoother, more aesthetically pleasing strokes. In Woman Swaying, dense layers of color are layered over the depiction of the skin, with pink, orange, white, and even bluish shadows blending along the skin’s texture . Here, it is no longer a matter of integrating color and form, but rather a sense of an inverted form in which color itself generates form. The body is generated not by contour but by the sway . In other words, rather than being composed by lines , the body appears to be at the bottom amid the rhythm of tension and attraction that arises between surfaces . This is the result of a pursuit of reality as one of the end goals of modern painting, in a way that differs from Cézanne’s pursuit of constructive space . One of the allures of the woman who is sulking is the serenity and dreamy introspection that permeates her expression. Her eyes are half-closed, and a wave of inarticulate emotion floats around her mouth. The softness of her hand touching her cheek seems to confirm her own existence, or to remind her of something. However, the interiority depicted here differs from 19th-century psychological depictions. Renoir’s female figures are always freed from personal narrative. Rather, they emphasize the primitive dimension of human existence—feeling and standing, just one step before thought . This silence and interiority transcend the momentary light of Impressionism and transform into a posture of surrender to eternal time . She stands there, motionless and silent. Her silence invites grateful reflection , drawing the viewer’s senses into a deep, tranquil place. The significance of this work’s exhibition, featuring these two masters who opened the exhibition Renoir x Cézanne Moderna at the Mitsubishi Art Museum Tokyo in 2025, is immense. While Cézanne, a contemporary of his, pursued nature as structure, Renoir thoroughly explored nature as sensation and body. This difference between the two forms the basis of the diversity of 20th-century art. While Cézanne demonstrated spatial tension and constructivity in his landscapes and living creatures, paving the way for the future as an advocate of small- and medium-sized paintings , Renoir tapped into a sensibility centered on the body and touch, transforming painting into a place of observation and life. “Woman Struck by a Large Scale” is a work that symbolizes this achievement and offers one answer to the question of how modern art can preserve human presence. “Woman Struck by a Large Scale” is more than just a female figure; it mirrors Renoir’s own existence. Even in the face of the reality of the passage of time, Renoir continued to paint, believing in his body and light. His later works are, so to speak, the study of growth itself, quietly yet powerfully illuminating the fundamental meaning of human life . The soft light shining onto the canvas is no longer sunlight, but a light of power emanating from within the painting itself. The silence of the woman with her hand on her cheek gently caresses the viewer’s heart, telling them that they too are there. It is the purest human emperor in the pictorial art form, the most genuine and profound form of love that Renoir achieved throughout his life . Starlight, a bond of love, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Gabriel and Jean. Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Gabriel and Jean, painted between 1895 and 1896, at first glance appears to be a mere representation of domestic and intimate conditions . However, the soft light and contours of the painting, the intersecting gazes, the delicate harmony between the figure and the background, and the emergence of motifs that are indispensable to the essence of Renoir’s art—family, femininity, play, and decorativeness—are all condensed into this one painting. Our school focuses on this work, which was also exhibited at the 2025 exhibition “Renoir x Cézanne Moderna” at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art . As one of Renoir’s masterpieces from his later years, we would like to examine it multifacetedly in light of its historical context, the artist’s lifestyle, and its expressive qualities. Is it a family portrait or a personal space? The title “Gabriel and Jean” refers to Gabriel Renard, Renoir’s film director and sound director, who would later serve as a model for many of his works. Gabriel had lived in Renoir’s family since just before Jean’s birth and was welcomed into the family . This work warmly depicts this private relationship, clearly signaling a shift in Renoir’s art at the time from public to personal intimacy . Of particular note is the artist’s treatment of the family portrait not as a mere documentary but as a universally beautiful and personal object. This is deeply connected to Renoir’s approach, which broke away from the Impressionist conception of the moment and pursued classical composition and decorative harmony . For him, family was not simply an object of life but a mother of beauty that supported the re-construction of art. Gabrielle, the model of existence, the goddess of fire and art, is essential to understanding the evolution of Renoir’s art, transcending the boundaries of mere sound waves . She later appeared as a model for many of Renoir’s works, particularly Laga, and contributed greatly to the embodiment of Renoir’s ideal of women. However, in Gabrielle and Jean, Gabrielle is depicted as a mother figure , a symbol of kindness and protection, before she assumed her role as a sacred goddess . Her delicate, desperately captured features, her smiling mouth, and calm eyes exude a sense of comfort more reminiscent of a mother than a gentle wave . Considering that Tsumarine often fell ill during this period and Gabrielle played a central role in the household, her presence could be said to have been a quiet pillar that connected the family and a source of artistic inspiration . Intimacy in Light: The composition of the pictorial space and the manipulation of the gaze. Viewers are first drawn to the two figures positioned at the center of the canvas. Gabriel’s blank gaze and Gabriel’s soft expression approach with an intimacy that seems to speak to the viewer . Of particular note is the extremely simplified depiction of the surrounding environment, barely depicting outlines, creating an atmosphere through color gradations. The table, like a brown lump leaning forward, the tapestry in the background, and even the toy sheep and cow are treated as if they were floating shadows in the light. This is a technique Renoir favored in his later years, combining decorativeness and symbolism to express sensations through the ambiguity of what is seen rather than depicting the actual nature of objects . Within this depiction, only the outlines of the figures stand out, creating the effect of concentrating the gaze of appreciation toward the bottom . This is not simply a deliberate production, but can also be seen as an expression of Renoir’s quest for the centrality of the human, his belief that human expressions and relationships are paramount, even over nature and tools . The Theme of Children: Renoir’s Utopian Fantasy It is well known that Renoir depicted children in many of his works. For him, children symbolized innocence, hope, and the joy of life, and they also represented freedom freed from the squalor of everyday life . Gabriel and Jean also belong to this group, and Jean’s young gaze and the movements of his tiny hands evoke a universal charm that transcends time and language. Here, Jean is not the protagonist of the story, but rather a being brought to life by his relationship with Gabriel. His gaze seems to focus on the intruder, but it also turns toward Gabriel and then to his toy. This chain of gazes gives the painting a gentle rhythm, unconsciously drawing the viewer into the work. In this way, children in Renoir’s paintings are not simply members of the family, but are depicted as the embodiment of the blessings and hope of the world. This is connected to the optimistic worldview that underlies Renoir’s sense of nature and humanity , and contrasts with the more interior or symbolic expressions of his contemporaries, such as Cézanne and Gagyat . Conviction in the Grass: The significance of this work, featured in the 2025 Renoir x Cézanne exhibition , lies in the contrast between Renoir’s world of vision and Cézanne’s world of construction. Renoir was a painter who constantly questioned the structure of seeing, and while his works appear at first glance to be filled with a sense of grass, they are constructed with an inherent formal tension. Renoir’s Gabriel and Jean, on the other hand, blurs form, and the soft, nuanced blending of paint colors creates the impression of the painting breathing . Here, there is a relationship rather than a construct, a contemplation rather than a calculation . The silent exchange between Gabriel and Jean, the warmth of their gaze, and even the changing density of the air are depicted as the colors. This unstructured intimacy contrasts with Cézanne’s poignant exploration, yet both possess a deep mythological quality in the sense that they laid the foundations of modern painting . This was a moment that clearly demonstrated the resonance between the two, precisely in line with the exhibition’s curatorial intent . Conclusion: Gabriel and Jean: A Time Machine Called Painting is not merely a domestic scene. It represents one culmination of Renoir’s themes of human love, femininity, and family; a time machine called painting that captures eternal time within the quiet of everyday life. This painting, with its genius features and gentle gaze, speaks to gratitude: what love, painting, and life are all about. The essence of beauty that Renoir pursued toward the end of his life shines through the two characters, Gabriel and Jean. The Essence and Texture of Painting: Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Play with Claude de Renoir: From the late 19th century to the early 20th century, European painting underwent rapid transformations. It was a time when the convictions of Impressionism were already widely recognized and the next wave of change was being explored. In such a time, Pierre-Auguste Renoir and Renoir’s brushes were never swept away by the mainstream of modernity, nor did they retroactively cling to tradition . Rather, they continued to explore their own unique aesthetic convictions. This belief is the expression of happiness in painting , the warmth of the human body and skin, and the quiet tranquility of family . One of the most mature works of Renoir’s art is “Claude le Noir at Play,” painted around 1905. This work, centered on the artist’s youngest son, Claude, and his children , beautifully combines Renoir’s domestic sensibilities with his interest in early 20th-century painting . The inclusion of this work in the exhibition of the two masters who pioneered the “Renoir x Cézanne Modern” movement in 1925, is not merely a family portrait, but also an excellent opportunity to experience the essence of Renoir’s art. The young boy depicted in “Claude le Noir at Play” sways his soft, blond hair, engrossed in playing. His cheeks are as firm as peaches, and he appears to have only just begun to speak . Claude was born in 1901, making him approximately four years old around 1905, the year of the painting’s creation . Many artists have used their sons as models, whose ages closely match the figures in the paintings. However, Renoir’s work is a testament to the delicate observation and exploration of color that go beyond simple parental affection. Claude’s figure never falls into the rigidity of portraiture, instead expressing natural movement and the low center of gravity characteristic of the artist. His gaze is directed off-screen, leaving the viewer free to imagine what he is looking at. This sense of intimacy lends the work warmth and persuasiveness. The gaze of a parent gazing at their child is directly present in the tip of the brush, and affection is embedded not simply in the subject but in both of them. For Renoir, the brush was an extension of his own hand as a parent . This naturalness is apparent in this work. Renoir had been feeling a certain crisis regarding the depiction of the human body since the late 1880s . While his experience pursuing light and color as a member of the group proved effective in outdoor landscapes and everyday scenes, he also began to feel that a more constructive approach was necessary when it came to portraying human figures, particularly those depicted in the traditional Chinese style. As a result, Renoir abandoned his style, emphasizing line and contour, following the classical tradition of Raphael and Ingres . However, around 1900, his constructive style returned to a softer tone, and color began to breathe freely again. One of the culminations of this process is Claude de Renoir at Play , in which the child’s skin, clothing, and the light in the background are depicted with an almost tactile quality. Claude’s skin is infused with complex tones that are not simply pink, representing the body itself, existing in the air and light. Subtle shadows run across his cheeks, limbs, and carefully capture the contours and softness of his face. Particularly noteworthy is the depiction of his white shirt and blue pants. The white is by no means a monotonous, solid color; instead, touches of purple and gray overlap , evoking the texture of the fabric. The blue, too, is not purely military, but a chromatic touristic hues tinged with various pleasant conversations. The silhouettes of the children subtly disintegrate and sway as they move . The accumulation of these depictions creates a pictorial experience that transcends the experience of simply seeing, one that feels like touch and being embraced . There is no specific scene depicted in Claude de Renoir’s Playing. The dance is not clearly defined, and it is unclear whether it is indoors or in a garden. However, what is important is that this ambiguity serves as a device to express the lodgings of everyday life. Renoir was a painter who believed in the happiness that was right in front of him throughout his life, and sought to affirm this in F. Whether his paintings feature a glamorous scene of boaters having lunch or a scene of people reading, there is a consistent affirmation of human existence. This is also true in this work, where the humble moment of children’s play acquires eternal value through painting. Happiness is not something to be imagined, but something to be discovered. Renoir’s paintings speak to us this way. He did not seek beauty or blessings in extravagant designs or grand compositions ; rather, he discovered and did not overlook them in the mundane corners of everyday life. The two masters who opened the Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition at our main store , Renoir and Paul Cézanne, are often considered targets, and their works are presented side by side. Indeed, there are significant differences in their approaches to formality and spatiality. While Cézanne’s approach was to break down his subject into structures and reconstruct them, Renoir emphasized tactile beauty and intimate relationships. However , when viewing a work like “Claudrenoir Playing,” the mythical quality of Cézanne’s exploration of form also emerges. The movements of Frode’s face and limbs are soft and natural rather than pneumatological, yet their contours are clearly defined, providing a three-dimensional understanding of space. This is the fruit of Renoir’s period of eschewing Ingres-style classicism, achieving a rare fusion of modern portability and sensuous intimacy . “Claudrenoir Playing” was created when Renoir was around 63 years old. It is said that Renoir was working on his ” Tatsucho” (The Dragon Town) project in 1915, and it was undoubtedly a project that was undertaken within his physical limitations . Even so, he continued to hold his brush, and even wrapped bandages around his hand, tying his paintbrush to it, showing his obsessive passion for painting. He would go on to produce numerous female figures that represent the pinnacle of physicality, as exemplified by the “Suitable for the Body” series. However, it is important to note that in this work, which marks a preliminary stage, the tentacles of the snake and the body of physical happiness coexist within a single pictorial space. It is also a quiet response to the question of how art deepens with pursuit. Renoir did not resist, but rather continued to explore new forms of expression within their limits. In this process, painting the image of his beloved son must have meant more than mere love. Pierre -Auguste Renoir’s “Claudrenoir Playing” is a work that proves that art can bear witness to happiness. There are no grandiose symbols or political statements here . It is a depiction of a child’s engrossed playtime, captured with boundless tenderness . Yet, it is this inaction that is the greatest event. If painting is not about recording events, but about imprinting the richness of existence that transcends events , then this work approaches that very essence. “Claudrenoir Playing” speaks more strongly yet quietly than anyone else that art exists to affirm life . Tenderness within direction. A new dimension of modern portraiture in Renoir’s work , Gabrielle in the Garden . Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Gabrielle in the Garden, a painting of women and happiness, was created around 1905 and represents one of the most intimate themes of his later years. It is neither a simple female figure nor a simple landscape. A woman is immersed in a dwelling place. Within this composition, Renoir’s long-cultivated artistic goal of portraying the lyricism of happiness is realized in a quiet and elegant manner. This work stands out for its domestic warmth and decorativeness, especially among the main collections of the Maison d’Arts d’Orsay and the Musée de l’Orangerie. It will also be featured as a key element symbolizing the ultimate prize of Renoir’s art at the Renoir x Sézanne Moderna exhibition , to be held at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. The presence of the model , Gabrielle Renard, is a woman who served the Renoir family for many years, was the painter’s third Claude, commonly known as his personal muse, and, above all, an important muse of Renoir’s paintings. Gabrielle served as a model for many of Renoir’s later works, appearing in a variety of compositions, from sketches to portraits and interior landscapes. Her voluptuous body, serene expression, and subdued presence embodied her as the ideal of feminine vitality that Renoir sought. In Gabrielle in the Garden, she is depicted in a sparse garden, clad in reddish clothing and twisted at an angle. There is no dramatic emotional quality or assertive pose here. Her mere presence evokes a sense of security and quality in the viewer. This is a testament to Renoir’s artistic trust in Gabrielle, and a participation in the very existence of women . Renoir’s Gabrielle in his later years: The maturation of his gabrielle and his gabrielle skin. Renoir’s gabrielle style underwent a major transformation in the 1900s. Starting out as a painter and immersed in his convictions about light and color, the young Renoir began exploring the uncanny in classical order and physicality from the 1880s onward . During this process, he learned from Renaissance masters such as Largo and Rubens, emphasizing the fullness and softness of form in his paintings. This tendency is evident in Gabriel in the Garden. The colors are bright and harmonious, yet the soft application of paint envelops the entire painting. The depiction of skin emphasizes the nuances of the paint created by layering paint over the clarity of outlines , creating the impression that the figure and background gently blend together. The delicate touches applied to Gabriel’s face and hands, in particular, create a sensuous texture that conveys the body’s temperature and even the circulation of blood . There is a beautiful balance here, with the weight and volume of the body yet never succumbing to vividness . The intimacy of the garden as a setting, the sharpness of Gabriel’s model, and Renoir’s masterful technique all combine to create a painting that is highly moving as a work of artistic quality . The garden as a pictorial space, the inheritance from the past, and the reconstructed garden were frequent motifs favored by Impressionist painters. Claude Monet continued to paint gardens at Giverny, while Eduardo Armanes captured a woman standing in a garden, holding a bouquet of violets and smelling the forest. For Renoir, the garden was also a perfect subject, as it represented the intersection of nature and woman, of life and beauty . The background of Gabriel in the Garden features trees and bushes bathed in soft sunlight, expressing Renoir’s distinctive decorative nature . His core gardens are never really about detail; rather, they are a visual representation reconstructed through the filter of memory and sensation. The crunching of teeth, the rustling of the wind, and even afternoon drowsiness lurk within the brushstrokes. Gabriel, standing here, slowly seeps into the viewer’s heart as if one with nature . Portrait as Decoration: A Person in Space One of the reasons that Gabriel in the Garden is more than a mere portrait is that it is painted as a figure in space. In other words, Gabriel is constructed not as a self-contained subject, but as part of her living environment . This perspective is closely related to the transformation of the concept of portraiture from the late 19th century to the early 20th century . Traditionally, a portrait was a record of a person’s personality, its mission being to express both the external and internal aspects of the body. However , modern painters like Renoir began to view the portrait as a relative entity, encompassing the subject’s surroundings and lighting conditions. In this sense, Gabriel in the Garden truly demonstrates a new approach to portraiture, a subtle interplay of decoration and record, body and space, and military and market forces. Renoir, as the pinnacle of his paintings of happiness, stated throughout his life that he wanted to portray joy and beauty, not suffering and tragedy . This philosophy permeates his work, and Gabriel in the Garden, which has established a strong reputation as a master of fine art, is the purest expression of those words. There is no major incident in the painting, but it is filled with the warmth of light, the calm presence of the woman, and the harmony between nature and man —songs of everyday life. This is not simply a painting, but a device of happiness. It soothes the viewer’s heart and gives a sense of time, connecting the past and the future . This work will play a highly symbolic role in the exhibition and its implications for the present. It will likely play a significant role in the two masters who opened the Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025. While Cézanne established the foundations of modernism with his constructive and analytical approach, Renoir embodied a soft, emotional, and blissful modernity. While the two artists appear to be polar opposites, they share a deep theme of examining the relationship between humans and nature. Renoir’s work, Seated Wiping Feet, is a masterpiece of the body and painting. Pierre-Augusse and Renoir are known as the “deadbeats” of Impressionism, but in their later years, they explored the mysteries of classical style and continued to pursue their own unique portrayals of women. Seated Wiping Feet, 1914, is one of the works that represents this culmination and is highly acclaimed as a masterpiece that encapsulates the essence of Renoir’s art. This work, which marks the opening of the exhibition Renoir x Cézanne Moderna at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025, will provide an opportunity for the two masters to demonstrate their evolution in Japanese curation. This highly acclaimed work, part of the Musée des Borangerie’s collection, truly represents the culmination of Renoir’s years of maturity, in which his art simultaneously blends spectacle, classical aesthetics, impression, movement, and grace . The first thing that catches the eye in this work is the figure of a lone figure, sitting in the center of the canvas, undressing. The model is slightly facing forward, bending her left leg and wiping her right leg with a towel. Her shoulders and back are rounded, and the movements of her arms are soft, creating a sense of supple movement throughout. However, this seemingly mundane movement is actually extremely meticulously structured. While Renoir captures the soft lines of Ruff’s body, he places the center of attraction in the twist of her body, naturally drawing the viewer’s gaze from her torso to the subject and into the depths of the space. The promotion of this composition is one of the perfected forms of his neoclassical impressionism, which was expected to emerge from the free-spirited demands of the impressionist era and combined with his admiration for ancient sculpture. One distinctive feature of Renoir’s paintings is his depiction of skin. Even as the model sits in the bath wiping her feet, her skin is constructed with rich, layered colors, tinged with bright, soft pinks and oranges, and occasionally a touch of gray. The brushstrokes envelop the contours of her skin in circular strokes, creating a sense of light reflecting off her skin . This fusion of light and skin is distinctly different from the Impressionist techniques of his youth, and is closer to Baroque masters such as Rubens and Titian. However, the late 19th and early 20th centuries also retain the color theory and scientific approach of Impressionism, beautifully demonstrating the duality of Renoir’s art. Renoir’s rough sketches from this period are often set indoors, without curtains, chairs, towels, or other paraphernalia. In this work, the soft cloth and warm tatami floor visible behind the woman emphasize the figure’s presence. This background treatment reveals that Renoir went beyond simple depictions of her body to portray an atmosphere and mood . While his depiction of light filling space and softly enveloping materials differs from Cézanne’s, it shares a common theme of attempting to unify space in a dynamic way . This exhibition highlights the simultaneous display of works by two often-held masters: Renoir and Cézanne. While Cézanne pursued structure and order and prioritized the logic of form, Renoir emphasized sensation and physical emotion . Renoir’s interest in “Seated Wiping Feet” lies not so much in the character of form as in the tactile appeal, but also in the almost palpable passion he evokes in his painting, striving to capture a tangible presence . While Cézanne opened the door to modernism by capturing nature in a far-reaching way, Renoir pioneered a different kind of modernism by continuing to depict the joys of the body. Renoir was 73 years old when “Seated Wiping Feet” was created in 1914. He was already suffering from severe arthritis, and his fingers were bent, so he wrote “F” with his hands fixed in place. Despite losing much of his physical freedom, Renoir continued to paint vivid, vibrant rough figures, as if in his younger days. In his studio in Les Collères, south of Cagnes, where sunlight streamed in and the warm air enveloped him, Renoir completed his works by moving his entire body. His devotion to art transcends mere craftsmanship . The women he painted during this period are filled with a powerful energy, as if celebrating the pain of the body, even while struggling with it. A painting of a woman sitting and wiping her feet is a symbolic example. In the early 20th century, paintings moved toward miniaturization, and representations of the body were often considered outdated. However, Renoir dared to buck this trend, continuing to paint vibrant depictions of the body. In this sense, the image of a woman sitting and wiping her feet is a modernist relic that depicts the abdominal muscles of the body, yet also an extremely radical expression. Returning the body to the center of the painting is not simply dismissive . It questions the origins of sensation and existence, and is connected to the reconstruction of the modern viewing subject. The softly illuminated body, amid the desire to sit and wipe her feet, is something to behold, once again confronting the viewer with its spectacle and complexity. Finally, it is important to emphasize that the act of sitting and wiping one’s feet is not simply a representation of the body, but rather a fundamental question: what is painting? Renoir pursued the eternal challenge of capturing the living body in painting. The question of how to balance the transience of the subject with the tactile eternal success is a conviction for painters behind the impression , and Renoir offered his own unique answer. His paintings are permeated with a desire to transcend the individuality of the model and portray an ideal of the eternal feminine. Woman Sitting and Wiping Her Feet is a hymn to the body that Renoir achieved in his later years, and at the same time, it represents a work that seems to be a point of obsession in painting. Born from the intersection of technique and perfection, classicism and conviction, illness and creativity, this painting is no mere raga. It reminds the viewer of the new power that lies between portraying humanity and portraying light . The display of Renoir’s Subdued Woman alongside Cézanne’s rough, constructive paintings in the 2025 exhibition provides the perfect opportunity to experience the two paths that modern art has taken. It raises deeper questions about the relationship between what is depicted and what is viewed, going beyond the question of whether art is about sensation or structure. The moment the woman quietly removes her legs, the art fair takes on a new meaning and continues to begin. Woman with a Letter: Renoir’s delicate light and the maneuverings of his superiors. Pierre-Augusse and Renoir are representative of late 19th-century French Impressionism, known as masters of light and color . His works capture fleeting scenes and the vivid expressions of people, successfully bringing happiness and market value to those who interact with them. Woman with a Letter, exhibited at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art’s opening exhibition of the two great artists who opened the 2025 Renoir x Cézanne Modern, is one of Renoir’s most important works, showcasing the maturity of his art. Woman with a Letter . Painted between 1890 and 1895, this masterpiece, housed at the Musée de l’Orangerie , is a portrait that captures a woman’s delicate inner world. The woman on the canvas holds a letter in her hand, gazes into the distance, and quietly surrenders to the flow of time . The work dates from the early to mid-1890s, a period when Renoir’s technique and refinement reached their peak. During this period, he combined the Impressionist caution and bright colors of his youth with a profound depiction of the human body and a classical aesthetic of composition. In other words, Woman with a Letter represents the mature period of his style. The central female figure in this work exudes a stern air, yet her expression reveals a complex psychological state. The letter she holds is more than just an antique; it also suggests a narrative and a sense of time. The viewer is drawn to her gaze—to her innermost thoughts and the message contained within. The composition is simple yet calculated. The woman is positioned slightly to the left of the center, and the lines of her arm holding the letter are gracefully curved. The background is softly blurred, drawing the eye directly to the model. The light is handled brilliantly, with a warm and soft glow shining on the woman’s face and hands, giving the entire work a delicate three-dimensional feel and a sense of life. Light and color are essential elements of Renoir’s work, and this painting is no exception. The woman’s pale skin stands out against the surrounding fasting clothing and the contrast with the background. His distinctive brushstrokes produce smooth yet rich colors, framing a sense of softness that is felt to the touch . The pale blue and cream colors of the background create a natural, serene atmosphere throughout the painting, while also expressing the woman’s inner calm and melancholy. Renoir’s depiction of light transcends mere physical phenomena, evoking emotions and resonating with the viewer . Renoir remained committed to the portrayal of the human figure throughout his life, particularly in capturing the softness and vitality of women. In many of his paintings, he depicted his models’ close friends and family, and the trust he felt with them underpins the warmth of his work. Although detailed information about the model for Woman with a Letter is limited, it is highly likely that she was one of Renoir’s close associates. Her facial expression and posture convey fleeting emotional intensity and personal reflection, demonstrating Renoir’s goal of capturing the human soul beyond mere portraiture . At the end of the 19th century, Renoir temporarily distanced himself from the harsh color palette of Impressionism and turned to more classical artistic techniques. This was a direction he shared with Archaism and Raphael . Woman with a Letter beautifully blends these traditional techniques with the lightness of Impressionist color . For example, the depiction of the contours of the human body and the application of shadows are precise and calculated , enhancing the presence and materiality of the model. At the same time, the freedom of the brushstrokes and the transparency of the coloring retain the vibrant spirit of Impressionism. This work is significant as a bridge between classical style and new sensibilities at the dawn of modernism. Late 19th-century French society was rapidly urbanizing and modernizing, and the role of women was also changing. Literature and In the art world, women have evolved from being depicted as mere objects or decorative objects to being subjects of emotion and thought . Renoir’s Woman with a Letter reflects this trend of the time while also delving into the inner world of women and initiating individual stories. The letter, a medium of communication, symbolized the transmission of information and the exchange of emotions in people’s lives at the time, and the figure of the woman holding it intimately conveys a range of emotions—waiting, thinking, and conveying. The symbolism of the letter also alludes to women’s self-expression and the expansion of their fingers in society at the time, while Renoir’s gaze respects the complex inner world of women. This work is a personal medium, depicting the landscape of a woman’s mind within a simple portrait. The two masters who opened the exhibition Renoir x Cézanne Modern at the Mitsubishi Museum of Art in 2025, where this work will be exhibited, are an attempt to explore the origins of modernist art from the late 19th century to the early 20th century . While Renoir depicted vivid human figures with the soft, emotional quality of Impressionism, Paul Cézanne focused on structural, scientific forms, paving the way for later Cubism and small- and medium-sized art. Woman with a Letter, a work by Renoir that sought to harmonize sensibility and reality, serves to convey the diversity and depth of modern art amid the exhibition’s grandeur and resonance. Woman with a Letter transcends mere late-19th-century portraiture and is a masterpiece that expresses delicate human emotions and the passage of time. Renoir ‘s exceptional sense of color, technical versatility, and warm affection for humanity are embodied here. Today, with digital communication taking over, letters have become a moment of momentousness, but the universality of the moment of longing and longing conveyed in this work remains unchanged. Visitors can experience the timeless exchange of human emotions in front of this painting and connect it to their own experiences and senses . Renoir’s brush continues to capture the timeless warmth and beauty of humanity . Soft light and the tranquility of time… Renoir’s Portrait of Two Girls. Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Portrait of Two Girls is one of the most representative works of his mature style from the 1890s, and it continues to capture our eyes and brims with a unique charm . The unique warmth of the painting, dancing lightly across the canvas, and above all, the calm, introspective atmosphere that rises from the canvas , speaks volumes about the essence of Renoir as a painter. We will explore this work in the context of the artist and Renoir’s own artistic sensibility , exploring its depth and appeal. Work Information and Exhibition Background: Portrait of Two Girls is one of Renoir’s masterpieces, housed at the Maison d’Orsay. It was exhibited as part of the Musée de l’Orangerie’s main collection at the Tokyo Mitsubishi Museum of Art’s Renoir x Cézanne Modern exhibition in 2025, which opened the exhibition. It evoked a quiet emotion among Japanese audiences. This exhibition sheds light on the diversity and confidence of modern French painting from the late 19th century through the 20th century through the work of two post-Impressionist painters, Renoir and Cézanne, who followed different paths. The subject of this work, Intimacy, with the models staring silently at each other, is clear. Two girls sit side by side, maintaining an intimate distance. The girl on the left is slightly older and gazes quietly at the viewer . The girl on the right looks over her shoulder, exuding a slightly anxious expression. Both girls have simple features, and the natural coloring of their cheeks, like a touch of crimson, adds warmth to the painting. The models are thought to be children of Renoir’s close family or close friends, but their identities are uncertain. What is important here is not who they are, but the quality of their gaze—how the artist sees or feels the two women’s condition. Renoir portrays his models not as physical objects but as intersections of light and emotion . The silence between the girls is by no means cold; rather, a gentle atmosphere of mutual respect pervades the painting. The women communicate not with words but with their presence. The intimacy dwelling in this silence is precisely the expression of human kindness that Renoir consistently sought. Light and Color: The culmination of Renoir’s sensibility. The use of light and color in this work demonstrates the essence of Renoir’s art. The girls’ skin is as smooth as ever, with pale pink and orange hues creating soft shadows. The cloth characters for “Fire Soldier” are subtly written in the background, and the colors of the chair-action garments quietly envelop the entire painting. Bright, gentle colors such as white, pink, blue, and beige are used throughout , blending together to create a soft harmony. During this period, Renoir was shifting his focus from the decomposing perspective of light of the Impressionist period to one that emphasizes the symmetry of objects and the reality of their existence . However, this was not simply a grotesque portrayal of reality; rather, it was a unique approach that could be described as a construction of harmony through color. He did not reject contours; rather, he allowed all the contours that appear in the painting to emerge naturally through gradations of color. Of particular note is the depiction of light appearing on the girls’ cheeks, paper, and dresses. It is never linear, but rather delicately shifting. For Renoir, light was not simply a physical phenomenon but a medium of emotion. The soft glow that seems to emanate from this painting could be said to embody the artist’s innermost feelings. Beyond Impressionism, Renoir’s classical approach. In the 1890s, Renoir abandoned his Impressionist convictions and approached more classical forms . His reverence for predecessors such as Rubens, Ingres, and Raphael is evident in his brushwork and color choices. In particular, the portraits of the two girls reveal the influence of Raphael’s Madonnas. The tranquil composition , soft notes, and clear Venus-like composition represent the straits of Renaissance art , while at the same time being a new interpretation based on a late 19th-century French sensibility. This classical approach was a path that many of his predecessors had traversed. Cézanne also eschewed Renaissance art and pursued structural rigor. However, while Cézanne emphasized the analysis and reconstruction of his subject, as seen in his depiction of nature as a rapids, Renoir adopted a more emotional and sensual classicism. In other words, Renoir viewed classicism not as a form but as a selective selection of nothingness. The image of innocence and the perfection of an era. This work is not the only example of Renoir’s preoccupation with the subject of young girls . His works frequently depict young women and children, such as girls playing the piano, reading, and dancing with Rougebal. This is thought to have been driven by a longing for nothingness in 19th-century France . Following the Industrial Revolution and the modernization of cities, people began to seek nature and purity as a kind of salvation. Girls were a symbol of this, and for artists, they were the source of idealism. Renoir was more acutely aware of the spirit of the times than anyone else, and it can be said that he was an artist who reflected the ideal of art in the image of young girls. However, his gaze never lingers on masculine possession or idealism. The paintings he places there gaze upon the world with boyish curiosity and affection. Renoir’s female figures are ubiquitous in the everyday, reaching not for solitude but for compassion. The portrait of two girls speaking across time at the end of the work celebrates profound meaning and aesthetic exploration beneath its seemingly serene composition. It is not merely a portrait; it is like a small song blooming at the very pinnacle of time. Standing before the painting, we encounter the gazes of the two girls and, beyond that, touch Renoir’s soul . There is a tender participation in human existence that transcends words. In the 21st century, we are bombarded with information and images at an unprecedented speed. Yet, the power of reflection evoked by these tranquil paintings may represent the most compelling contemporary value. The gentle light and silence born from Renoir’s brushstrokes will continue to speak to our hearts, from the past to the present and into the future .

【傑作第三十二部　28選】ピエール＝オーギュスト・ルノワールー印象派の中心人物ー人物画の名手ー色彩の魔術師ー後期の古典主義的傾向
展覧会【ノワール×セザンヌ ―モダンを拓いた2人の巨匠】
オランジュリー美術館 オルセー美術館 コレクションより
会場：三菱一号館美術館
会期：2025年5月29日(木)～9月7日(日)
___________________________________
ピエール＝オーギュスト・ルノワール（Pierre-Auguste Renoir）についての重要なポイントを五つ挙げます：

1. 印象派の中心人物
ルノワールは印象派を代表する画家の一人であり、クロード・モネらとともに、自然光の効果や屋外での制作（en plein air）を重視した新しい絵画スタイルを開拓しました。特に光と色彩への感受性が際立っています。

2. 人物画の名手
風景や静物も描きましたが、特に人物画を得意とし、柔らかな肌の質感や豊かな色彩によって、女性や子どもたちの日常を温かく描写しました。「ムーラン・ド・ラ・ギャレットの舞踏会」や「ピアノを弾く少女たち」などが代表作です。

3. 色彩の魔術師
彼の作品では、明るい色彩とやわらかい筆致によって、感情豊かで生き生きとした表現がなされています。色彩によって光や空気を感じさせるその技法は、後の画家たちにも大きな影響を与えました。

4. 後期の古典主義的傾向
晩年には印象派の自由な筆致からやや離れ、ルーベンスやラファエロのような古典絵画に学び、より構築的で量感のある表現へと向かいました。特に裸婦像において顕著です。

5. リウマチを抱えながらも制作を継続
晩年には関節リウマチに苦しみましたが、筆を手に縛りつけてでも絵を描き続けました。この姿勢は、芸術への情熱と意志の強さを象徴しています。

美術品鑑賞第936回【花瓶の花】ピエール=オーギュスト・ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第938回【桃】オーギュスト・ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館
美術品鑑賞第940回【雪景色】オーギュスト・ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第947回【セーヌ川のはしけ】ギュスト・ルノワールーオルセー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第948回【海景、ガーンジー島】ルノワールーオルセー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第949回【アルジェリア風景、ファム・ソヴァージュ（野生の女）峡谷】ルノワール‐オルセー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第950回【イギリス種の梨の木】ルノワールーオルセー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第952回【若い男と少女の肖像】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第954回【長い髪の浴女】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第955回【風景の中の裸婦（Baigneuse dans un paysage）】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第956回【ピエロ姿のクロード・ルノワール】オーギュスト・ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第957回【ピアノの前のイヴォンヌとクリスティーヌ・ルロル】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第958回【ピアノの前の少女たち】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第959回【2人の少女の肖像】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第960回【手紙を持つ女】 ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第962回【座って脚を拭う浴女】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第967回【庭のガブリエル】ルノワールーオルセー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第968回【遊ぶクロード・ルノワール】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館
美術品鑑賞第969回【ガブリエルとジャン】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第970回【頬づえをつく女】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第971回【バラをさしたブロンドの若い女性】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第972回【帽子の女】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第974回【バラ】ルノワールーオルセー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第975回【桟敷席の花束】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第977回【チューリップ】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第978回【花】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第982回【いちご】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵
美術品鑑賞第983回【りんごと梨】ルノワールーオランジュリー美術館所蔵